This piece is important not only due to its value in exposing who No'am Chomsky is, but also because it is an excellent compendium of the real issues that should be the concern of every Leftist, and would be, were it not for the untiring disinfo efforts of Chomsky.
Don't let the fact that this was first published at Rense put you off. Important information often appears on Rense's site because D'Powers Dat Be know that Rense is kooky when it comes to UFOs and such and they know that any information that appears on his site will be taken as untenable as a result.
Interspersing difficult-to-internalize, world view-shifting truths with the far-out is a common technique used to put rational people off to considering information the elites don't want considered and analyzed in depth.
Usually, where there's a reptilian or a grey on a site, there's a tidbit of fact you need to know. The Wheat and chaff principle is generally in order.
The following is wheat and I present it to you because enough damage has been done by this weasel, about which I have been writing for years.
His father, the illustrious Wm. Chomsky, true Anarchist, friend of the working person, Wobblie, scholar and gentleman, must be crying in Heaven for this disgrace of a son of his.
"Noam Chomsky: Controlled Asset Of The New World Order"
Daniel L. Abrahamson / PREVIOUSLY CARRIED AT RENSE.COM April 6 2006
Noam Chomsky is often hailed as America’s premier dissident intellectual, a fearless purveyor of truth battling against media propaganda, murderous U.S. foreign policy, and the crimes of profit-hungry transnational corporations.
He enjoys a slavish cult-like following from millions leftist students, journalists, and activists worldwide who fawn over his dense books as if they were scripture. To them, Chomsky is the supreme deity, a priestly master whose logic is beyond question. However as one begins to examine the interviews and writings of Chomsky, a different picture emerges. His books, so vociferously lauded in leftist circles, appear to be calculated disinformation designed to distract and confuse honest activists. In fact, since the 1960's Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper, using his elevated status to cover up the major crimes of the global elite.
His formula over the years has stayed consistent: blame “America” and “corporations” while failing to examine the hidden Globalist overclass which pulls the strings, using the U.S. as an engine of creation and destruction. Then after pinning all the worlds ills on American imperialism, Chomsky offers the solution of world government under the United Nations.In his book “The Conspirator’s Hierarchy,” Dr. John Coleman named Chomsky as a deep cover CIA agent working to undermine social protest groups. Certainly Dr. Coleman’s claims appear validated by an honest review of Chomsky’s role as a Left gatekeeper.
Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the evidence of government complicity and prior knowledge. Furthermore he claims that the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission are “nothing organizations.” When critiquing poverty, he never mentions the Federal Reserve and their role in manipulating the cycle of debt.
Similarly, he claims the CIA was never a rogue organization and is an innocent scapegoat; that JFK was killed by the lone assassin Lee Harvey Oswald; that the obvious vote fraud in 2004 did not occur; and that peak oil is real and good for humanity.
What he does advocate is population control, gun control, support for U.N.E.S.C.O., and the end of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government under the UN. In other words, the major goals of the New World Order.
Chomsky’s role in propaganda paradigm is much like that of Karl Marx: to present a false liberation ideology which actually supports the desired solutions of the elite. Marx pointed out the inequalities and brutality of capitalism and then advocated a one world bank, army, and government with the abolition of private property and religion; in other words, the major goals known of the New World Order.
Tens of millions of activists worldwide still remain trapped by this scam, failing to recognize the inherent autocratic and elitist structures of Marxism-Leninism or the newer incarnation under Chomsky.
The Globalist elites and their army of social scientists at the Tavistock Institute understand that people are going to question the inequities of the current economic system. For example, why is wealth distributed so unevenly between classes and countries? Why are those living in third world nations allowed to die from preventable diseases and starvation? Why does the U.S. government sponsor and direct such murderous foreign policy? Why was America attacked on 9-11?
In other words, why is the world embroiled in such violence? Who is behind all this suffering? And most importantly, what solutions would relieve the poverty and destruction plaguing the worldwide population?
Enter Chomsky, the controlled opposition, to play the role of re-direct agent. He discusses a mere fraction of the real elite manipulation and then quickly pushes his followers into dead-end solutions and alienating rhetoric. Chomsky’s hero status is further amplified by Left gatekeeper publications like Z Magazine, DemocracyNow!, The Progressive, and The Nation.
Is it a coincidence that all of those magazines receive major funding from Globalist front-groups like the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, and MacArthur Foundation? Chomsky may be the head gatekeeper, but he works alongside a network of fellow Globalist assets like Amy Goodman who do their best to appear radical while avoiding all the hardcore issues and deliberately leading the Left into oblivion.
The following analysis will show that Noam Chomsky is a deep cover agent for the New World Order, a master of black propaganda whose true motives become clear with a sober and honest examination.
911:
Noam Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper in the aftermath of the 9-11 crimes, lashing out at the 9-11 truth movement and claiming any suggestions of government complicity are fabrications. The “radical” Chomsky takes a position so deeply rooted in denial that it makes the staged 9-11 whitewash commission look like an honest study. He belligerently refuses to discuss any of the massive evidence proving government foreknowledge and participation in the crimes, claiming it would destroy the activist movements worldwide:
“If the left spends its time on this, that's the end of the left, in myopinion: the mainstream would be utterly delighted. It is highly likely that nothing significant will be found. And if -- which I verygreatly doubt -- something is found that would quickly send everyonein Washington to the death chamber, the left is unlikely to emergetriumphant.”
In other words, Chomsky is telling his followers to ignore the evidence because according to him, none exists. However even if there is massive evidence, responsible activists should ignore it because it would be “the end of the Left.” Chomsky’s role as a 9-11 gatekeeper goes even further as he denies each piece of evidence individually. The following examples should suffice:
A) As most honest 9-11 researchers know, 7 of the accused 19 hijackers are alive, proving the official story is a fabrication. Many of the remaining 12 were trained as U.S. Air Force bases and CIA-connected Huffman Aviation. Many of the accused “religious fanatics” acted more like degenerate contract agents, as they flashed wads of cash, visited strip clubs, drank profusely, blew cocaine, smoked weed, cavorted with strippers and had strange meetings in the drug-rich Florida keys.
Men like Mohammed Atta fit the MO of an undercover CIA drug runner: a man trained at U.S. Air Force bases, fluent in many languages, able to evade INS regulations, working with drug dealers, and receiving wired bank funds from CIA-linked Pakistani intelligence. There remains no photographic evidence of these supposed hijackers ever getting on the planes (walking through airport security does not count). Furthermore, the autopsy list of Flight 77 which supposedly hit the Pentagon listed none of the accused hijackers.
Regarding the evidence of government complicity in training the hijackers, Chomsky wrote the following:
Nothing empirical is impossible. Thus, it is conceivable that everyonein the White House is totally insane. And in my opinion, that's what they would have had to be to try something that would have been very likely to turn into an utter fiasco, and if by some miracle had succeeded,would almost certainly have leaked, so that they would all be facing the death sentence. Possible, but not likely.
B) What about the unprecedented NORAD stand down on 9-11 which broke standard operation procedure? Over 67 times in 2001, NORAD had dispatched jets when they deviated from their flight path. In 1999, when golfer Payne Stewart’s single engine Lear in depressurized, NORAD planes were flying around the vessel in 20 minutes.
But on 9-11, Ben Sliney, in his first day on the job as hijacking coordinator for the FAA, delayed calls to NORAD. Meanwhile NORAD ran at least 7 hijacking drills that morning like Operation Vigilant Guardian where commercial jets crashed into government buildings in Manhattan, Washington DC, and Virginia. These “mock” drills, designed to give live on 9-11, helped to distract the honest people within NORAD and the FAA, and to evade suspicion from patriotic investigators within the CIA, FBI, and NSA’s Echelon network.
Of the subject of the NORAD stand down, Chomsky wrote the following:
“Whether NORAD followed SOP, I have no idea, not having investigated the matter. I think the case is very weak, and diverts people from the really serious issues.”
C) What about the document called “Operation Northwoods” signed off in 1962 by the Joint Chiefs of Staff like Generals Lemnitzer and Landsdale? These men, sworn to protect the Constitution, devised a plan to create false-flag terrorism in order to engineer a war with Cuba. Their treasonous plans included the following:
-"Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft could appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the Government of Cuba."-"Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government."- "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba . . . casualty lists in U.S. newspapers cause a helpful wave of indignation."
This document was discovered in the National Archives and has been the subject of mainstream articles by ABCNEWS and others. It stands as clear evidence that the U.S. government has designed plans to engineer terrorist attacks and blame them on foreign enemies. Yet Noam Chomsky does not think the Northwoods document matters:
Operation Northwoods example is only one of many reasons for being skeptical about this: it doesn't even come close, and it was not carried out. Furthermore, there is nothing in history that even remotelyresembles what is being proposed. Of course, that does not show thatthe thesis is impossible: nothing could show that, by definition. And if someone can put together some evidence and refute the arguments as to why it is extraordinarily unlikely, then the matter will be worth pursuing.
Chomsky’s role as the chief 9-11 gatekeeper proves he is distracting his leftist followers from the truth. Instead of facing the clear facts, he claims that 19 hijackers did it and that al-Qaeda is a real terrorist enemy. When presented with documented evidence, from living hijacker patsies to the NORAD stand down, he simply claims it doesn’t exist. He resorts to emotional “they would never do it” appeals in order to deny the obvious. Chomsky is exhibiting far more than logical skepticism, but instead is actively engaging in disinformation.
9-11 Prior Knowledge:
Chomsky denial of government complicity in the crimes of September 11 is one thing, but he goes further, claiming the government had no prior knowledge of the attacks. Mind you, this is a position even weaker than Michael Moore’s tepid Fahrenheit 9-11, which at least tacitly suggested a degree of prior knowledge.
Chomsky’s position is untenable. For a man who prides himself on science and logic, his steadfast refusal to acknowledge mainstream media reports finds him using arguments similar to Holocaust deniers; one can show them photographs, videos, testimony, and physical evidence but the burden of proof is impossible. Such is the case with Chomsky who ignores the many government admissions of prior knowledge widely available even in the 9-11 whitewash commission report. Here is Noam Chomsky writing on government prior knowledge:
That tells us even less. Every intelligence agency is flooded, daily,with information of very low credibility. In retrospect, one can sometimes pick out pieces that mean something. At the time, that'sa virtual impossibility. By arguments like this we can prove that someone blew up the White House yesterday.
If they did not have prior knowledge, why were Cheney and NORAD running drills that morning where hijacked jets flew into buildings in New York, Washington DC and Virginia? Also, wouldn’t the NSA’s Echelon network have picked up the chatter?
Of course, Chomsky does not even admit the Echelon network exists. This despite the NSA’s openly acknowledged ability to monitor all phone calls, emails and satellite communication with keyword software which can identify phrases and immediately begin tracking the communication. This despite their admitted bases at Fort Meade, with sister sites in the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and other unknown locations.Students of the intelligence world know full well that the NSA’s Echelon network picked up the chatter for weeks before the attacks. In fact, the NSA admitted it, saying that on September 10 agents intercepted calls from hijackers but, *ahem*, did not translate them until after the attacks. Such admissions are red herrings, clearly designed to excuse massive prior knowledge at tops levels of the intelligence circles.
What about the President Daily Briefing given to Bush in late August which discussed the threat of hijacked jets? What about intelligence groups like Able Danger and FBI agents like Robert Wright who warned of the flight school trainees? What about FBI agent John O’Neill’s investigation into Al-Qaeda financing which was quashed by Bush? What about attorney David Schippers who desperately tried to warn Ashcroft about the impending attacks? Why was the CIA admittedly tracking the accused hijackers since 2000? Why was FEMA running drills in Manhattan that morning out of WTC-7? Why did PNAC documents like “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” call for helpful Pearl Harbor style attacks?
Those are just a smattering of the mountain of evidence proving beyond any reasonable doubt that the U.S. government had prior knowledge. But Chomsky must deny these, because his role is to mislead and distract while chastising the 9-11 truth movement.
CFR/Bilderberg/Trilateral Commission:
Before and after 9-11, the key role for the Left Gatekeepers like Chomsky has been denying the existence of the overclass which prints the money, funds and manages the wars, ships the drugs, controls entire industries, and creates the scientific propaganda which plagues society. Instead they critique mid-level minions & front corporations while speaking in glittering generalities.
In the world of Left gatekeepers, the New World Order does not exist. There are no elite plan for global government. Instead they paint the picture of a profit-motivated world in which corporations control the government. But merely blaming corporations misses the forces which own their assets, manage their resources, control their board of directors, and pull their strings.
Thus in the world of Chomsky, puppetmaster families like the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and Morgans do not control the financial, oil, pharmaceutical, and narcotics trade; the Oppenheimers maintain no influence over diamond, gold, iron ore, copper, uranium, titanium, and platinum markets; and we can certainly forget about investigating the European Black Nobility like the Vun Thurn und Taxis, Alba, and Saxe-Coburg dynasties.
Chomsky also vehemently denies the role of the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission in the creation and management of the wars and poverty he claims to condemn. When speaking on such “conspiracies,” he said the following:
It's the same with the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, all these other things the people are racing around searching for conspiracy theories about-they're "nothing" organizations. Of course they're there, obviously rich people get together and talk to each other, and play golf with one another, and plan together-that's not a big surprise.
But these conspiracy theories people are putting their energies into have virtually nothing todo with the way the institutions actually function. (Understanding Power, 348)
Chomsky’s comments would be laughable if they weren’t polluting so many good minds. He is clearly trying to misdirect his readers way from discovering the New World Order: the interlocking web of organized crime run by the global elite, as they race toward their goals of worldwide eugenics and a technofascist world government.
Let us examine these so-called “nothing organizations” in more depth:
The CFR, funded by Wall Street and the Rockefellers after WW II, is an organization openly sworn to destroying American national sovereignty in favor of world government. They have acted as the de-facto “secret team” in managing U.S. domestic and foreign policy, orchestrating wars like Vietnam and the first Gulf War.. Almost all executives in the CIA and State Department have been members of the CFR, whether it was Dean Rusk, Allen Dulles and Robert McNamara during Vietnam or Richard Armitage and George Tenet during the crimes of 9-11.
The CFR has acted as the dominant roundtable group pushing for a Panamerican Union by 2010 which would dissolve national borders and unite Mexico, Canada, and America under a single currency, with biometric ID cards and GPS-tracked vehicles on camera-strewn superhighways. How can Chomsky seriously claim the CFR is a “nothing organization” when their role in crafting policy is so clear? Whom is he trying to protect in denying the treasonous goals of the CFR?
Chomsky’s stonewalling on the Bilderberg raises even more suspicions. Since 1954 the Bilderberg has served as the central brain of the New World Order, the major secret gathering for Globalist agents from across the globe. Bilderberg chairmen like Prince Bernhard and David Rockefeller have pushed for total global government, eugenics population control, engineering wars, and controlling the worldwide economy. Top politicians from America and Europe also undergo a grooming process at the Bilderberg. Bill Clinton went in 1991 as Rockefeller’s personal guest, and Tony Blair attended in 1993 before becoming Prime Minister. John Kerry attended in 2000, and John Edwards did two weeks before becoming the VP nominee in 2004.
Major members of the media, such as editors from the Economist, NY Times, Newsweek, Washington Post, US News and World Report are regular attendees. Yet they rarely, if ever, mention the proceedings, sworn to secrecy by their globalist masters.
Nevertheless in recent years, the truth has emerged. Major media outlets like the BBC admit the Bilderberg is planning for a one-world currency, bank, and army. Articles in Reuters and the Financial Times of London have admitted the existence of the Bilderberg, their grooming of politicians, and their secret plans for world governance. If these mainstream media reporters can admit the major role of the Bilderberg in shaping world affairs, why can’t Chomsky? Why is he holding back?
Simlarly, how can Chomsky seriously ignore the role of the Trilateral Commission, the brainchild of Globalist masters David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski? This is the same Brzezinski who helped direct the first CIA funds to bin Laden, and in his book Between Two Ages called for a technotronic society with a microchipped population. The Trilateral Commission openly admits they are trying to control the economy through closer European-Japanese-American cooperation.
They operate much like the CFR, counting the worlds top elites, politicians, corporate executives, and media barons as members. They have been instrumental in creating the destructive “free trade” agreements that are destroying America’s economy and national sovereignty in order to usher in world governance.
Journalist Jim Tucker, a Spotlight reporter with impeccable credentials, also links the Trilateral Commission to the international narcotics trade, the $500 billion-plus racket from heroin and cocaine alone which helps fund the Globalist’s house of cards.
What would motivate Chomsky to call the Trilateral Commission a “nothing organization?” Is it because they echo his goal of a world government? Or are there darker forces at work?
When balanced against over 50 years of documented evidence, Chomsky’s claims are exposed as nothing more than spurious lies and denial.
Federal Reserve:
Similarly, while Chomsky bemoans the widespread poverty in America and the Third World, he has never spoken publicly on the role of the Federal Reserve, nor their European master, the Bank of England. Therefore most Leftist activists are unaware of the roles played by these privately owned bank cartels which print worthless fiat currency out of thin air.
Since its secret formation at Jekyll Island in 1910, and subsequent illegal passage during the Wilson administration, the Federal Reserve has held the American economy hostage: creating inflation and boom & bust cycles through managed money supply and interest rates.
Furthermore every dollar printed is merely debt charged to the federal government. Thus while it only costs 10 cents to print a $100 bill, the U.S. government fits the bill for the full $100 to the private Fed.
The creation of the Federal Reserve, owned largely by the Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild interests has eluded the “radical” Chomsky. Furthermore he does not discuss the proven role of the Fed in creating recessions and depressions in order to purchase assets at a fraction of their value.
Chomsky systematically ignores the role of the fiat currency system which drives down wages, inflates prices, and puts the American economy under the iron claw of a few elite families. Since the dollar is the base currency for worldwide trade and the current economic house of cards, shouldn’t these topics be discussed?
Perhaps Chomsky stays mute because a central bank fits into his ideology. After all, one of the key planks in the Marxist and Fabian socialist agenda is a managed central bank in order to control the economy. Or perhaps he fears discussion of the Fed would expose the real hidden hand that secretly manages the world economy. For him it is easier to blast the front corporations and low-level grocery boys.
CIA:
If he denies even basic government foreknowledge of 9-11, should it be any surprise that Chomsky avoids criticism of the CIA? When asked about the links between the CIA and bin Laden, and the CIA’s overt support of the Taliban, Chomsky wrote the following:
“CIA support for bin Laden (which is not quite accurate) or the Taliban (also not quite accurate) doesn't seem to me remotely relevant.”
How can Chomsky write this with a straight face? He is simply ignoring the documented evidence of CIA funding for the “freedom fighters” known as al-Qaeda, totaling over $6 billion. The cozy CIA/al-Qaeda relationship continued through the Bosnian conflict via training of the drug-peddling Kosovo Liberation Army.
Chomsky also denies the mainstream reports from UK and French newspapers about two top CIA agents meeting with Osama bin Laden for over ten days in July 2001 while he received dialysis at the American Hospital in Dubai. Why is Chomsky afraid of the evidence showing bin Laden remains little more than a CIA mole? And what about those meetings between Taliban leaders, oil executives, and Bush administration officials from January to August 2001 to discuss building an oil and gas pipeline for Unocal?
But Chomsky goes further than that. While claiming to critique the CIA, he absolves the agency of any responsibility for its actions, from Nazi origins via Project Paperclip to heinous mind control experiments like MK ULTRA. This horrific period in CIA history, a true Rosetta stone in understanding the New World Order, is scientifically ignored by Chomsky, who sees the CIA as an innocent victim of White House orders:.
Or take the CIA, which is considered the source of alot of these conspiracies; we have a ton of information about it, and as I read the information,the C.I.A. is basically just an obedient branch of theWhite House. I mean sure, the C.I.A. has done thingsaround the world- but as far as we know, it hasn'tdone anything on its own.
There's very little evidence-in fact, I don't know of any-that the C.I.A. is some kind of rogue elephant, you know, off on itsown doing things. What the record shows is that theC.I.A. is just an agency of the White House, whichsometimes carries out operations for which theExecutive branch wants what's called "plausibledeniability"; in other words, if something goes wrong,we don't want it to look like we did, those guys inthe C.I.A. did it, and we can throw some of them tothe wolves if we need to. That's basically the roleof the C.I.A., along with mostly just a collection ofinformation. (Chomsky, “Understanding Power”)
Like all of Chomsky’s claims, this one is based on emotion, conjecture, and opinion. He does not cite any specifics, knowing full well that his fawning minions will accept his word as gospel.
Chomsky sees the CIA as a pathetic collection of scapegoat bureaucrats, acting as grocery boys for their master President. According to him, the CIA does not carry out secret projects on their own, and if accused of such, are innocent.
JFK Assassination/CIA role:
Therefore is it any surprise the Chomsky endorses the lone assassin and magic bullet theory in the assassination of JFK? From his emergence as a guru of the Left in the late 60's, Chomsky has belittled anyone researching the anomolies stemming from the official story and Warren Commission cover-up. According to him, any examination is a complete waste of time:
The Kennedy assassination cult is probably the moststriking case. I mean, you have all these peopledoing super-scholarly intensive research, and tryingto find out just who talked to whom, and what's theexact contours were of this supposed high-level
conspiracy-it's all complete nonsense. As soon as youlook into the various theories, they always collapse,there's just nothing there. But in many places, theleft has just fallen apart on the basis of these sheercults. (Chomsky, Understanding Power)
Chomsky’s position puts him in the less than 15% of Americans who believe Oswald was the lone shooter. For such a self-proclaimed “anarchist” radical, Chomsky’s trust in Warren Commission’s official story seems akin to a child’s belief in Santa Claus.The facts of course, tell a different story. While far from perfect man, Kennedy ran afoul by opposing the very forces that took over after his death. He began withdrawing 5,000 CIA “advisers” from Vietnam; fired CIA chiefs Allen Dulles and Richard Bissel; disbanded the CIA and handed over covert operations to the State Department; ordered the creation of a silver-backed government currency to break the Federal Reserve monopoly; turned down the Operation Northwoods plan to engineer false flag terrorism and blame it on Cuba; and refused to invade Cuba and launch a full scale nuclear war during the Missile Crisis, a plan favored by hawks like General Curtis LeMay.
Chomsky ignores the true history of the Kennedy presidency because it would expose te shadow government takeover after his assassination.
What about Chomsky’s claims that the CIA never acts as a rogue elephant? Do they hold up?
MK ULTRA/Project Paperclip:
Chomsky has never publicly acknowledged the covert CIA mind control programs known as MK ULTRA and its many offshoots. This program alone shows how the CIA was indeed a rogue elephant, as they ran illegal campaign of propaganda, brainwashing, sex slavery, and poisoning of citizens.
In 1946, Globalist bagman Harry Truman began a covert plan to smuggle top Nazi SS officers, scientists, and propagandists into America. Those same war criminals quickly became the front line for the postwar U.S. intelligence machine. Reinhard Gehlen, one of Hitler’s top intelligence chiefs, led postwar European intelligence for the CIA, becoming the darling of head honcho Allen Dulles.
Then, using his same crew of Gestapo and SS, aided by the Vatican, and sponsored by the CIA, Gehlen set up “rat lines” which smuggled 5,000 of the worst Nazi criminals into South and Central America. Butchers like Klaus Barbie, Mortin Bormann and Josef Mengele among others owed their freedom to this program.
Those same men would later aid CIA coups in Angentina, Chile, Paraguay, Brazil and other countries. After all, they were veteran experts: early Gehlen projects had included rigging elections in Italy and France. By 1955, more than 760 German scientists had been became U.S. citizens, many specializing in black research projects. This growing cabal of Nazi doctors found a happy marriage with the control freak elitists infesting the NSA, CIA, and black operations government.
These men birthed the MK ULTRA program, focusing on mass mind control, via drugs, hypnosis, subliminals, and pulsed electromagnetic waves. It was this mad science, spawned in the Nazi labs of Dr. Josef Mengele, that now obsessed men like Sidney Gottlieb, John Lilly, Jose Delgado and Ewen Cameron.
Their most famous project was the creation of Manchurian candidates, used for political assassinations, drug transportation, espionage, and sabotage. Yet this was not limited to Sirhan Sirhan.
In fact, both Gottlieb and Cameron helped train thousands of pre-adolescent children for use in child prostitution, sex slavery, blackmail, satanic rituals and murder. Known as the Monarch Project, children were kidnaped from American streets and foreign nations and then programmed with trauma based mind control.
Other common victims for experimentation included prisoners, the homeless, and residents of mental institutions, all cherry-picked because they were defenseless. Details of this horrific and still operational program are available in rare and highly suppressed texts of Fritz Springmeier, which usually fetch over $300 a piece.
Why does Chomsky refuse to discuss MK ULTRA and its sister projects? Why does he claim the CIA was merely a pawn of the White House, when the record proves that Eisenhower and Kennedy had little, if any knowledge of MK ULTRA? Simply put: Why is Noam Chomsky covering for the CIA?
Elite Child Sex Rings:
The Monarch Project of prostituting children deserves further mention (although Chomsky would disagree). In 1988 Vice President Bush was caught having 15 year-old call boy prostitutes visiting the White House late at night. The credit cards records to prove it were splashed across the front page of the Washington Times: "Homosexual Prostitution Inquiry Ensnares VIP's with Reagan, Bush Sr."
Unfortunately the star witness, Craig Spence, was suicided in his hotel with piano wire before he could testify. Book like "The Franklin Coverup" by John DeCamp have further proven the links between the CIA and Army intelligence to the elite sex slavery rings. Cases of like the "The Finders" in Washington DC, where customs agents discovered a CIA warehouse full of child porn and satanic torture, stand as yet further evidence.
In the forrmer Yugloslavia, CIA front company Dyncorp has been convicted of operating in the human slave trade and using their C-130's to ship many of the 200,000 women and children smuggled out every year. Furthermore, mainstream news outlets have shown evidence of UN Peacekeepers assisting the sex trade in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Balkans.
Despite the voluminous amount of grotesque evidence, Chomsky has never discussed the elite sex trade. This is an issue so shocking, so paradigm-altering, that his Leftist followers would no longer trust their loving mother government, and that is the last thing Chomsky wants. After all, if the Leftists knew that top level politicians are actually pedophiles practicing satanic ritual abuse, they would no longer trust the savior world government. The absence of Chomsky and the Left on the suffering of these children speaks volumes about their true moral character and motives.
MK ARTICHOKE/ MK NAOMI:
Other MK ULTRA side projects included pushing LSD to the youth culture and attaching electrodes into prisoners heads, the latter perfected by Dr. Delgado. Adjunct programs like MK NAOMI and MK ARTICHOKE focused on genetically engineered viruses, biological agents, and radiation effects on American citizens. Common experiments included testing biological agents and atomic weapons radiation on soldiers, the mentally handicapped, people in subways, and even whole towns; putting cancer viruses into polio vaccines; and exposing pregnant women to radiation to test the effects on the fetus. These experiments have been documented as continuing into the 1980's and likely still continue today.
Chomsky does not discuss these horrendous programs, because it would awaken his readers to the cruelest fact: that the U.S. government will murder its own citizens and soldiers, killing hundreds of thousands of unwitting subjects simply for political gain. After all, if they would feed radiated breakfast cereal to thousands of retarded children, would these same parasitic elites not also kill more than 2,800 Americans on September 11?
Fluoride:
Of course MK ULTRA lives on today in our drinking water. It was around the time of its inception, in the 1950's, that the U.S. government began adding sodium fluoride to tap water in massive quantities.. Should we be shocked? After all, the first people to use the deadly neurotoxin were the Nazis, who found it pacified the concentration camp prisoners. Now thanks to imported Nazi doctors helping our friendly neighborhood CIA, American citizens could enjoy the same privilege as those in Hitler's camps.
Chomsky has never discusses the effects of sodium fluoride, nor the lead and arsenic used in water as silent weapons of pacification. As a scientist, he is apparently uninterested in sodium fluoride's proven link to cancer, leukemia, osteoporosis, Alzheimer disease, and brain damage.
So should we be surprised that he never writes about the deadly poison aspartame found in thousands of products? Or genetically modified foods and growth hormones which destroy immune systems while causing blood disorders and swelling of the organs? Or cell phones which emit deadly microwave radiation leading to cancer, vision loss, and (according to published BBC reports) altering human DNA? Or the GWEN towers which pulse deadly ELF radiation across America?
Rockefeller Pharma Cartel:
The Nazi doctors who didn’t end up in American intelligence found cushy jobs in the pharmaceutical cartel firms like Merck and Eli-Lilly. Chomsky never discusses the history of these firms; nor the Rockefeller control over the American Medical Association; nor the link between mercury-tainted vaccines and brain damage; nor the deadly mind control drugs like SSRI’s (Prozac, Zoloft, etc.) and amphetamine-based Adderall/Ritalin pills pimped out to helpless children.
These drugs cause bone degeneration, memory loss, suicidal tendencies and added depression to the poor kids gobbling them like Flintstone’s chewables, all at the advice of their pill-pusher death merchant doctors. Meanwhile Chomsky stays true to form, ignoring these matters and instead calling for socialized, Federally-controlled healthcare which would further subsidize the pharma cartel. This is just another example of his bait and switch tactics, a sloppy mess of disinfo and elite sponsored solutions.
Psychiatry/ New Freedom Initiative:
Chomsky and his Left Gatekeepers also ignore the assault from psychiatric community, largely controlled by the Rockefellers and Tavistock Institute, which seek to define every neurosis as a mental illness in order to push more drugs. Bush has signed the New Freedom Initiative to forcibly psychologically test all K-12 students in public schools, screen them for “mental illnesses,” and force the children to take the recommended drugs.
This brainwashing agenda was pushed by the pharma cartel, with GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Merck and others investing millions in buy-offs and lobbying. But news of this extraordinary Stalinist plan never graced the pages of Chomsky's editorials, nor Z Magazine, The Nation, the Progressive, and DemocracyNow. Perhaps this is because the New Freedom Initiative fits into their goal of government-controlled socialized health care.
The New Freedom Initiative, bolder than Stalin’s wildest dreams, is just a small part of the eugenics agenda; a dominant Globalist goal which Chomsky and his Left Gatekeeper bagmen aid and abet. Chomsky has never written about the sinister American Psychiatric Association, nor the role of it's former chief, Dr. Ewen Cameron, the aforementioned MK ULTRA villain and CIA child programmer.
Key aspects of the scientific eugenics movement such as population control, abortion legalization, poisonous vaccinations, and stem cell research find their most vocal advocates on the far Left of the managed political debate. Leftist college majors like sociology advocate programs like parental licensing by the state, state-controlled child care, and Chinese style childbirth laws with forced sterilization as a penalty.
Leftists call for more vaccinations in the Third World despite the admittedly tainted vaccines used by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. All of this is indicative of an infiltrated movement, a Left deeply penetrated by Globalist agents driving activists into unwittingly championing the Brave New World.Population Control:
Population control by any means necessary is a major, some would say the major goal of the New World Order, perhaps even paramount to their goal of a cashless society control grid with microchipped slaves. The chief architects of population control are Bilderberg elitists like David and Nelson Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Prince Philip, Ted Turner, Alexander Haig, and Cyrus Vance. Their Malthusian nightmare requires killing 90% of the “useless eaters” through war, genetically engineered viruses, and engineered starvation. Declassified documents like NSM 200 and Global 2000 lay the plans out with cold precision.
Chomsky, the self-proclaimed radical, also advocates such depopulation methods. In Chomsky’s book “Understanding Power,” a collection of his talks with activists, a crowd member asks about population control, to which Chomsky responds:
If we continue to produce energy by combustion, the human race isn’t going to survive much longer...Yeah, population control is another issue where it doesn’t matter if you do it, everybody has to do it. It’s like traffic: I mean you can’t make driving a car survivable by driving well yourself; there has to be kind of a social contract involved, otherwise it won’t work. (61)
Chomsky and other gatekeepers claim to maintain the moral high ground, but then advocate the eugenics agenda pushed by elite roundtable groups like the Bilderberg and Club of Rome. How can Chomsky claim to be an advocate for the Third World while simultaneously pushing for the managed murder agenda favored by Henry Kissinger?
Gun Control:
Another one of the great successes of the Left gatekeeper has been pushing for unconstitutional gun control agenda through their publications like The Nation, Z Magazine, The Progressive, and their internet kin at DemocracyNow! & Indymedia. It is a great achievement of propaganda when the supposed radicals “opposing Bush” call for a completely disarmed American populace and inflated budget for BATF thugs in ski masks. Chomsky mock s those who support the Constitutionally endowed right to bear arms. In fact, he says it doesn’t exist:
It’s pretty clear that, taken literally, the Second Amendment doesn'tpermit people to have guns. But laws are never taken literally, including amendments to the Constitution or constitutional rights. Laws permit whatthe tenor of the times interprets them as permitting.” (Secrets, Lies, and Democracy)
Then later in the interview, Chomsky is asked if guns are a proper way to respond to government tyranny. He responds as follows:
As for guns being the way to respond to this, that's outlandish. First of all, this is not a weak Third World country. If people have pistols, the government has tanks. If people get tanks, the government has atomicweapons. There's no way to deal with these issues by violent force, even if you think that that's morally legitimate.
Guns in the hands of American citizens are not going to make thecountry more benign. They're going to make it more brutal, ruthlessand destructive. So while one can recognize the motivation that liesbehind some of the opposition to gun control, I think it's sadlymisguided. (Secrets, Lies and Democracy)
It would be one thing to hear such rhetoric out of the Fabian socialists in the Democratic party. But to have the supposed “fringe radicals” saying there is no second amendment and advocating gun seizures is remarkable. And because of globalist infiltration of the left, this policy once favored by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and other mass murderers has found a comfortable home. Hence it has become common to hear activists protesting the Iraq quagmire while simultaneously calling for gun control.Environmental Front Groups:
As masters of propaganda, the Globalists have uses their Left Gatekeepers to push eugenics and population control as necessary for the environment. This has been accomplished through the phony environmental movement and Peak Oil fabrications. The Club of Rome, a globalist front group created in 1968, immediately began calling for population reduction under the guise of environmentalism.
Other fronts like the World Wildlife Fund, managed by the aforementioned Prince Philip, vocally push for population control while seizing large swaths of land for “Mother Earth.” Other pet projects such as the Kyoto Protocol, which would give the UN total control of energy resources, have floundered.
Past WWF board members have included Bilderberg founder Prince Bernhard, Hollinger media gopher and Bilderberg member Conrad Black, Shell chairman John Loudon, King Juan Carlos of Spain, Prince Henrik of Denmark, and accused drug dealer Henry Keswick.
Chomsky is one of the many re-direct agents who use the real environmental pollution problems to push for a fascist takeover by a world government. Much like the ideas discussed in the Report From Iron Mountain, he uses the threat of global warming to justify totalitarian control:
Suppose it was discovered tomorrow that the greenhouse effects has been way understimated, and that the catastrophic effects are actually going to set in 10 years from now, and not 100 years from now or something. Well, given the state of the popular movements we have today, we’d probablyhave a fascist takeover-with everybody agreeing to it, because that would be the only method for survival that anyone could think of. I’d even agree to it, because there’s just no other alternatives right now. (Understanding Power, 388)
Here is Noam Chomsky, openly advocating a fascist takeover because the ends justify the means. This is classic problem-reaction-solution programming, as he points to the real threat of pollution and then offers the solution of tyranny.
Peak Oil:
As previously stated, the environmental movement was funded and amplified by Globalist oil, banking, and drug cartels, with specific help from the Rockefeller Foundation. The WWF, along with other phony NGO’s like the Sierra Club and Greenpeace consistently call for population reduction. Additionally these groups push the flat earth thesis of “Peak Oil,” predicting that oil supplies will soon run out and of course...require massive worldwide population reductions.
Chomsky posted an entry called “Peak Oil” on his blog in June, 2004, writing the following: “The basic theory is incontrovertible. The only questions have to do with timing and cost.”
Then in a radio interview with Steve Scherr, Chomsky said the following of Peak Oil: There's another side to this, there's a sense in which it'sadvantageous if the oil peak is earlier. The reason why is it willcompel the world, primarily the U.S. here, to move toward somethinglike sustainable energy.If there's unbounded amounts of hydrocarbons, we're just going to destroy the environment for human life or most biological life, so theearlier the peak is, in some respects - yes, it could be catastrophic,it could also be beneficial.
The “beneficial” aspects Chomsky discusses are likely the resulting population control and starvation that would ensue from such a shortage.
But in reality oil is abiotic and constantly regenerating. This, while huge wells go untapped in Russia, Equatorial Guinea, Nigeria, Sudan, Cuba, Indonesia, Iraq, Alaska, Venezuela, Bolivia, Norway, and the Gulf of Mexico. Additionally, refinery capacity has been deliberately shut down by the oil oligopoly in order to create artificial supply shortages. Market prices are controlled by the Anglo-American cartel and they intend to use this as a vehicle for engineered crises. At this years Bilderberg meeting Henry Kissinger reportedly predicted $100 a barrel oil within a year. The only possible result is a complete worldwide depression.
It is within the “radical” Left that horror stories of diminishing oil find their home. Even within the 9-11 truth movement, authors like Mike Ruppert and Nafeez Ahmed have attempted to attach Peak Oil as the reason for government engineering of 9-11 and the wars in the Middle East. By polluting the activist movements with Peak Oil lies, the Globalists have created an army of strong advocates for $5 a gallon gasoline.
Project for the New American Century (PNAC)
Another triumph of Chomsky’s disinfo campaign has been the active denial of the The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neocon group that published radical statements calling for world war, population control, and a worldwide police state back in 2000. The signatures on the documents included Dick Cheney and cabinet members like Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, Dov Zakheim, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, and Eliot Abrams.
It was Zakheim who previously ran Systems Planning Inc., which made remote-control software for commercial airliners. Also as comptroller of the Pentagon, he lost over $3 trillion of taxpayer money without explanation. Yet his corruption was not singular; after Bush took his figurehead position in the stolen election of 2000, all of the PNAC radicals became the architects of 9-11 and purveyors of pre-war lies about Iraq.
Their infamous “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” document, produced in 2000 before 9-11, reads like prophecy, calling for theater wars against Iraq, Iran, and North Korea. They also admitted that "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." September 11, anyone?
They also openly called for killer viruses to wipe out large sectors of the human population. The document states: "[A]dvanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."
How can Chomsky and his kin ignore the statements of the PNAC cabal, whose mad plans for world domination read like the lost chapters of Mein Kampf?
If the Left Gatekeepers won’t discuss these published documents, how can we expect them to research the true history of AIDS and the potential emerging avian flu? Should we be surprised when they fail to mention the 60 plus dead microbiologists after 9-11, many of them leading researchers in emerging viruses? Should we look to Chomsky to find an expose of the heavy metals and biological agents in chemtrails?
Isreal/Zionists:
Many authors of the PNAC documents were radical Zionists linked to the Likud party in Israel, who presented similar plans to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996 (“Policy for a Clean Break”).
Chomsky, the supposed critic of Israel, has been praised by followers for his books like “The Fateful Triangle” which detail many Israeli war crimes. Furthermore he often criticizes the Isreali-linked network dominating U.S. foreign policy. But as always, Chomsky again avoids the hardcore issues, instead speaking in glittering generalities.
For example, he remains mute on the “Office of Special Plans,” the ad-hoc nerve center of pre-war Iraq propaganda, run of Cheney’s office. It was here that Zionist moles like Paul Wolfowitz, Larry Franklin, Douglas Feith, Stephen Cambone, and Richard Perle cooked up phony WMD threats, links 9-11, and collaboration between secular Iraq and Al-Qaeda.
Those same gophers, many of them assets of the Israeli Likud party and intelligence syndicate Mossad, operated a two-way spy network; just as manufactured propaganda flowed from Mossad to the OSP moles, U.S. secrets on Iran secretly floated into Sharon’s war cabinet.
In the middle of all the traitorous espionage was the mafia don of all lobbying cartels, the Israeli-controlled AIPAC. Top level AIPAC officers like Steve Rosen often acted as a go–between, then using that same fake intelligence to strong-arm the Congress where they control both sides..
All parties mentioned, from Rosen to Franklin, are now under investigation from the FBI and Justice Department for the aforementioned crimes. Major articles in the Washington Post now admit Franklin, working with Feith and Cambone, was passing secrets to Israel through AIPAC. Chomsky has never spoken publically about any of these topics, and certainly not the Mossad involvement in false-flag terror events like the USS Liberty and connections to 9-11.
Vote Fraud:When he isn’t busy covering up the facts surrounding 9-11 or the crimes of the CIA, Chomsky spends time actively denying the vote fraud of 2004, which ushered in another term for the neocon dictatorship. Chomsky often brags that he does not vote in presidential elections, noting that both sides are owned by corporations. But he has openly denied the role of electronic voting fraud in 2000 and the more prominent example of 2004. In 2004, exit polls in Ohio and Florida showed John Kerry winning by a comfortable margin, but mysteriously numbers showed a Bush victory.
The room for vote fraud was immense. The Secretary of State in Ohio, Ken Blackwell, managed Bush’s campaign in the state, much like Katherine Harris did in Florida during 2000. Diebold, the company which makes most of the electronic voting machines, is crawling with former CIA and NSA members and used convicted felons to design their software. The Diebold CEO Walden O’Dell is a Bush Pioneer and wrote in a GOP fundraising letter that he was “committed to delivering electoral votes to the President.”
The Diebold code is private and has been exposed as being easily hacked by Bev Harris at BlackBoxVoting.org. In North Carolina and Georgia, machines were throwing out 5,000 block votes for Bush without explanation. But none of this seems to interest Chomsky, who finds the accusations of vote fraud to be without merit:
I don't find the evidence compelling. An inaccurate count in itself is arandom effect. As for collusion, yes, there are concerns, but concerns arenot evidence. The problem that concerns you may or may not be real, but inmy view, even if we take the worst case scenario, it is still marginal --just as the Florida chads were marginal in the 2000 elections. I know of noreason to suppose that electronic voting will have more than a random effect.
Chomsky and the gatekeepers cannot discuss the fraud of electronic voting because it would awaken too many people to the total bankruptcy of the system. It is important that college activists at Berkeley think their vote for Ralph Nader counted. If they knew the entire game was rigged like a Don King boxing match, too many illusions would break down.
World Government:
Chomsky plays the Left gatekeeper role perfectly, presenting a false dialectic of the evil American imperialist as the antagonist aggressor, contrasted by the savior UN world government as the benevolent deux ex machina.
This false propaganda model, pitting the imperialist U.S. against the godly UN fits the classic MO of “poisoning the well.” Essentially, Chomsky acts as a re-direct agent: he acknowledges many crimes of American foreign policy and then offers world government and international law as the solution.
The Globalists have long been masters of such a paradigm. In the early part of the 20th century, the same Wall Street bankers crafted the doctrines of Communism. While posing as a workers’ liberation theology, it pushed for a central bank, world army, world court, world government, and the abolition of religion, private property, and the nation state.
Like other “anarchist” agent provacatuers such as John Zerzan (who helped train violent mobs to ruin the Seattle WTO protests in 1999), Chomsky has called for the elimination of private property. He argues, "that some form of council communism is the natural form of revolutionary socialism in an industrial society.”
In fact, Chomsky goes further, pushing for the elimination of the nation-state and national sovereignty to be replaced by a one world government:
“Well in my view what would be ultimately necessary would be a breakdown of the nation-state system- because I think that’s not a viable system. It’s not necessarily the natural form of human organization.” (314)
Chomsky, echoing rhetoric from the phony Marxist doctrines, is essentially endorsing the major goal of the world elite: the breakdown of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government.
Noam Chomsky is a shameless world government pimp, and has heaped lavish praise on men like Bertrand Russell who helped design the New World Order. Lucky for him, Chomsky has been publicly rewarded for his faithful service to the UN cause. In February 2004 he received the Award of Excellence at the UN Correspondents Association Club in New York. Previous winners included Globalist assets like Mikhail Gorbachev.
UNESCO:Since Chomsky is an avowed global government cheerleader, is it any surprise he supports some of the worst UN programs? U.N.E.S.C.O, the nightmare UN vehicle posing as an “aid” organization, finds a strong advocate with Chomsky.
Long a pet project of the Malthusian-obsessed Rockefeller clan, U.N.E.S.C.O projects include filtering pro-UN propaganda into American schools and with the goal of eventually merging the curriculum with Mexico and Canada in the proposed Panamerican Union; and seizing control of huge swaths of American federal lands through "UN World Heritage" sites. The first U.N.E.S.C.O chief Julian Huxley said during his tenure in 1948:
"The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism, global in extent... It can stress… the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world political organization… Political unification in some sort of world government will be required…to help the emergence of a single world culture."
But Noam Chomsky, ever the advocate of the UN, endorses the goals of U.N.E.S.C.O wholeheartedly and lambastes the evil conservatives who question its motives:
U.N.E.S.C.O-because it’s working for the Third World-we practicallyput them out of business. The United States launched a huge propaganda campaign against U.N.E.S.C.O. in the 1970's and Eighties- it was full of outrageous lies, totally fabricated, but nevertheless it sufficed to eliminatethe Third World orientation of U.N.E.S.C.O. and make it stop doing thingsit was doing around the Third World, like improving literacy andhealth care and so on. (86)
PROPAGANDA:
Many credit Chomsky’s “Manufacturing Consent” with being the premier study of government propaganda. In Leftist circles it is hailed as a Bible, a rite of passage for any true activist to understand the system. But again, Chomsky’s work, while appearing radical, is actually gatekeeper disinfo.
Chomsky spends the entire book attempting to prove that newspapers diminish American war crimes while exaggerating those of foreign governments. Such a point is easy to prove, and he does so in his own droll and methodical method.
Yet he stops there. Chomsky does not discuss the real elephant in the room: direct CIA collaboration with media outlets and journalists beginning in the 1950's under Operation Mockingbird.
Chomsky avoids writing about Mockingbird, the CIA program which covertly put major publishing, newspaper, and media outlets, as well as thousands of individual reporters under direct agency control. Agents included Ben Bradlee at Newsweek, Henry Luce of Time and Life, and Arthur Sulzberger of The New York Times, Alfred Friendly of the Washington Post, and Joseph Harrison Christian Science Monitor.
Shouldn’t this a significant development for a historian authoring an honest study of propaganda? After all who is to say that this program doesn’t still continue? The Bush administration has admitted spending hundreds of millions on fake newscasts and paying individual reporters like Armstrong Williams to push talking points in newspapers. What about the times they haven’t been caught? Exactly how many mainstream commentary and news outlets work with the CIA and White House?
Perhaps this is the reason why the scripts of the nightly news on ABC, CBS, and NBC are almost exactly the same, while Newsweek, Time, and the New York Times push the elitist agenda on cue (as seen most prominently in the run up to the war in Iraq).
Furthermore Chomsky does not discuss collaboration between the Bilderberg Committee and the major media outlets. Shouldn’t this concern the so-called radical anarchist, when media editors attend secret meetings calling for eugenics, world government, and a cashless society control grid?
Owners, editors and writers from Time, Newsweek, Economist, Washington Post, New York Times, CBS, NBC, ABC and every news outlet in between have attended the world government meetings.
Furthermore, what about the influence of the CFR, which openly calls for a Panamerican Union and the end of American national sovereignty? The CFR counts amongst its members major editors, owners, and journalists in media outlets from PBS to CBS, CNN to News Corp., New Republic to U.S. News and World Report.
Aren’t these the reasons that journalists push the propaganda Chomsky identifies? In “Manufacturing Consent,” Chomsky takes limited aim at an easy target. But he fails to dig deeper and examine the actual reasons why the propaganda permeates the mainstream media opinion. Clearly the influence of the CIA, CFR, Bilderberg Committee, and White House have turned major media outlets into little more than docile commissars. Additionally, the interlocking interests of media owners with the military industrial complex have served to sway content even further.
Chomsky’s “classic” study is little more than a limited hangout project. He is merely shooting the messengers, blaming journalistic “bias” while failing to follow the trail of money, power, corruption, and black propaganda. Instead, he identifies some passive propaganda and is hailed as a brilliant analyst and purveyor of truth by the Leftist minions. But his true achievement is ignoring the reasons behind the lies, as he executes a masterful bait and switch tactic. Is it a coincidence that Chomsky’s co-author for “Manufacturing Consent,” Edward Herman, has also denied any government complicity in 9-11?
While claiming to expose propaganda, Chomsky has perfected the art.
CONCLUSIONS:
Chomsky and his gatekeeper contemporaries are perfect devises for the Globalists because they help define the limits of the false left-right paradigm. Much like David Horowitz, a former Leftist, currently does for the radical Right. Is it a surprise that he edited a book called “The Anti-Chomsky Reader?” It should only be natural since they both serve the same role of gatekeeper.
Puppets like Horowitz, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Michele Malkin, William Kristol, William F. Buckley and their kin serve as Right Gatekeepers. They criticize the failures of liberals and Democrats and then call for Bush worshipping, illegal wars, fascist government, and giving up all of our Constitutional rights for “security.” In doing so they pollute the movement and help marginalize true conservatives voices like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and groups like Gun Owners of America.
Chomsky and his gatekeepers do the same thing. They write about the crimes of American imperialism and then call for population control, gun control, global government under the UN, and a totally socialized Brave New World society.
The Left gatekeepers must manage the delicate tight rope act of appearing radical while in actuality calling for worldwide enslavement and murder. In all likelihood they get a little help from the propaganda scientists at the venerable Tavistock institute in London and adjuncts of the CIA’s Mockingbird program; clearly the Left’s denial of 9-11 truths has been too coordinated too have simply been a freak occurrence.
In the mainstream it is the same with the staged battles between pawns like Democratic operative Al Franken and Republican Ann Coulter.
All of this is designed to create a tight spectrum, a masterfully crafted false paradigm to enslave the mind and give the people false choices. Thus at either extreme of the spectrum and all points in between, from Chomsky to Horowitz, one finds they are endorsing total enslavement and global government. This is the genius of the New World Order, their complete castration of free political will through carefully managed propaganda agents. The rest of the media jackals serve as willing accomplices, mere useful idiots and power hungry sycophants with massive egos and more concern for their career than the truth.
Noam Chomsky and his Left Gatekeeper associates must be actively exposed for their role in the propaganda system. For nearly 40 years since they infiltrated the activist movement, these Left gatekeepers have made the activist movements impotent, territorial, confused, and ineffective. Thus instead of understanding their enslavement, many activists end up calling for tighter chains by echoing Chomsky’s calls for gun control, population control, and a world government under the UN. They end up critiquing the Iraq disaster without seeing government involvement in 9-11 and the CIA/MI-6/Mossad creation known as Al-Qaeda.
Noam Chomsky and his clique of re-direct agents mercilessly push real activists into dead-end solutions. Until they are vocally exposed, the Left will continue to remain a managed asset of the New World Order."
Source: http://prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/060406Chomsky.htm
Monday, March 10, 2008
Conspiracy Fact
Someone made the mistake of claiming there's no proof to support the position that there is a conspiracy of elitists.
Some of the evidence, is, admittedly, circumstantial.
Much of it is direct, concrete and verifiable, however. Let's focus on the verifiable stuff.
The Rothschild Banking website states clearly that they lend to governments. So does the Morgan Bank site.
When one loan to governments, which wouldn't be borrowing at 27 -35% interest if they weren't really strapped for the money (and the question as to how this situation arises in the first place demands answering), one controls the governments one has lent to and that jibes with this very real statement: "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws." Mayer Amschel (Bauer) Rothschild
The Federal Reserve system really does make people work almost four months a year to pay backs the loans.
The IRS really is not a legal government agency and there really is no law on the books requiring American citizens to pay income tax. But they really do confiscate everything and put people in Federal penitentiaries if they don't pay anyway.
There really is an Israeli Supreme Court building that contains an inordinate number of Masonic symbols and the letter of Dorothy Rothschild to Shimon Peres telling them that they intend to "gift" Israel with the construction of the building and listing provisos does exist.
The Georgia Guide Stones really exist. They really do say, in 12 languages, that the Earth's population should not exceed 5 E8. Take a cruise on Georgia Highway 77 and you'll find them seven miles north of Elberton.
The world really is descending into a prison state for no good reason.
Hi-tech electronic and sonic weapons deployed by the US in Iraq really are being deployed in the US now and they are being trained on citizens of the US. Citizens deemed "dissidents" are really being harassed and repeatedly assaulted by these weapons. The radiation from these weapons has been picked up by recordings made by these "TIs" (targeted individuals) and Federal attorneys reallyhave been forced to admit in court that US citizens were targeted for assault with these weapons by the government.
Vaccinations that babies routinely receive really do contain Thermisol, a preservative that is a mercury compound, which really does reduce cognitive ability, as well as aluminum and a lot of other nasty materials no one in their right mind would inject into a baby. And a family whose daughter was made autistic and epileptic from those shots just really won their case in Federal court. She was given nine inoculations at once at the age of one and one half years. Two of the injections were proven to contain mercury-based Thermisol.
Some toothpastes, soaps and other products used topically (skin does absorb materials and those materials do enter the blood stream) and orally really do contain Triclosan, so does agent orange - really. One drop of Triclosan in an Olympic-sized swimming pool of water is still poisonous. Triclosan combines with chlorine in water to form chloroform and other compounds.
Drinking water really does contain the very same fluoride compounds, called hexafluorosilicic acid (H2SiF6) and its salt sodium hexafluorosilicate (Na2SiF6), which is in Sarin nerve gas and Prozac. The Nazis really did fluoridate the water supply of inmates to get them so docile that they complied with their deaths. They only used sodium fluoride, a much less poisonous compound.
Despite being warned by ecologists for decades of the effects of pollution, world governments continue to pollute the atmosphere at an increasing rate. They see ecological systems shutting down. Yet they continue.
Nazi scientists really were brought to the US after WWII and really were integrated into the military-industrial complex. Have you heard of Operation Paperclip and MK Ultra? Former CIA agents have, and they've blown the whistle on it.
Prescott Sheldon Bush, father of GHWB and grandfather of GWB, really did have his holdings frozen by Acts of Congress for aiding and abetting the Nazis. Look for: Vesting Order No. 126, Vesting Order No. 248, Vesting Order No. 259 and Vesting Order No. 261 at the Library of Congress. See The US Library of Congress and The US National Archives & Records Administration. Do the research. Americans need to know just how deep the Bush involvement was.
President Bush really was pictured at the 2007 memorial service for 9/11 making the horned hand signal that he, and his family, make so often. Perhaps he was honoring the Texas Longhorns at that ceremony. Gooo, Texas!
Top scientists have admitted what HAARP can do - and one of the things it can do is cause atmospheric disturbances that mimic global warming. Put your tin foil hat on - because that baby really does produce scalar waves. No, scalar waves are not only produced shortly after the Big Bang. Nikola Tesla really did it and HAARP is based on that research.
I could go on...and on.
Any theory should be replaced with another that explains more phenomena better.
I know of no explanation that explains what we're seeing on the ground than that the world is being controlled by a financial elite, a financial elite that goes on the bar nothing principle and has proven to the world that it is capable of any atrocity and engages in them with relish.
If another explanation that explains more of what we are witnessing and/or does so better is presented, I'll be the first to amend what I now think to be true based on a great deal of evidence that is none the less concrete and real because most people feel spacey when they encounter it.
I know it's scary. I know it's overwhelming. That does not make it untrue or unverifiable. That certainly does not release us from our being beholden to learn these facts and know just what we're up against.
I know it makes people feel crazy to think about this. I know why. The reason why is MK Ultra.
There is substantiation aplenty for every statement I made here - and vastly more.
I suggest you do the research yourselves. Doing the actual research goes a long way to undoing the effects of brainwashing that we have all been subjected to. Brainwashing can be erased. The process is slow and painful, but it can be done.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Someone made the mistake of claiming there's no proof to support the position that there is a conspiracy of elitists.
Some of the evidence, is, admittedly, circumstantial.
Much of it is direct, concrete and verifiable, however. Let's focus on the verifiable stuff.
The Rothschild Banking website states clearly that they lend to governments. So does the Morgan Bank site.
When one loan to governments, which wouldn't be borrowing at 27 -35% interest if they weren't really strapped for the money (and the question as to how this situation arises in the first place demands answering), one controls the governments one has lent to and that jibes with this very real statement: "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws." Mayer Amschel (Bauer) Rothschild
The Federal Reserve system really does make people work almost four months a year to pay backs the loans.
The IRS really is not a legal government agency and there really is no law on the books requiring American citizens to pay income tax. But they really do confiscate everything and put people in Federal penitentiaries if they don't pay anyway.
There really is an Israeli Supreme Court building that contains an inordinate number of Masonic symbols and the letter of Dorothy Rothschild to Shimon Peres telling them that they intend to "gift" Israel with the construction of the building and listing provisos does exist.
The Georgia Guide Stones really exist. They really do say, in 12 languages, that the Earth's population should not exceed 5 E8. Take a cruise on Georgia Highway 77 and you'll find them seven miles north of Elberton.
The world really is descending into a prison state for no good reason.
Hi-tech electronic and sonic weapons deployed by the US in Iraq really are being deployed in the US now and they are being trained on citizens of the US. Citizens deemed "dissidents" are really being harassed and repeatedly assaulted by these weapons. The radiation from these weapons has been picked up by recordings made by these "TIs" (targeted individuals) and Federal attorneys reallyhave been forced to admit in court that US citizens were targeted for assault with these weapons by the government.
Vaccinations that babies routinely receive really do contain Thermisol, a preservative that is a mercury compound, which really does reduce cognitive ability, as well as aluminum and a lot of other nasty materials no one in their right mind would inject into a baby. And a family whose daughter was made autistic and epileptic from those shots just really won their case in Federal court. She was given nine inoculations at once at the age of one and one half years. Two of the injections were proven to contain mercury-based Thermisol.
Some toothpastes, soaps and other products used topically (skin does absorb materials and those materials do enter the blood stream) and orally really do contain Triclosan, so does agent orange - really. One drop of Triclosan in an Olympic-sized swimming pool of water is still poisonous. Triclosan combines with chlorine in water to form chloroform and other compounds.
Drinking water really does contain the very same fluoride compounds, called hexafluorosilicic acid (H2SiF6) and its salt sodium hexafluorosilicate (Na2SiF6), which is in Sarin nerve gas and Prozac. The Nazis really did fluoridate the water supply of inmates to get them so docile that they complied with their deaths. They only used sodium fluoride, a much less poisonous compound.
Despite being warned by ecologists for decades of the effects of pollution, world governments continue to pollute the atmosphere at an increasing rate. They see ecological systems shutting down. Yet they continue.
Nazi scientists really were brought to the US after WWII and really were integrated into the military-industrial complex. Have you heard of Operation Paperclip and MK Ultra? Former CIA agents have, and they've blown the whistle on it.
Prescott Sheldon Bush, father of GHWB and grandfather of GWB, really did have his holdings frozen by Acts of Congress for aiding and abetting the Nazis. Look for: Vesting Order No. 126, Vesting Order No. 248, Vesting Order No. 259 and Vesting Order No. 261 at the Library of Congress. See The US Library of Congress and The US National Archives & Records Administration. Do the research. Americans need to know just how deep the Bush involvement was.
President Bush really was pictured at the 2007 memorial service for 9/11 making the horned hand signal that he, and his family, make so often. Perhaps he was honoring the Texas Longhorns at that ceremony. Gooo, Texas!
Top scientists have admitted what HAARP can do - and one of the things it can do is cause atmospheric disturbances that mimic global warming. Put your tin foil hat on - because that baby really does produce scalar waves. No, scalar waves are not only produced shortly after the Big Bang. Nikola Tesla really did it and HAARP is based on that research.
I could go on...and on.
Any theory should be replaced with another that explains more phenomena better.
I know of no explanation that explains what we're seeing on the ground than that the world is being controlled by a financial elite, a financial elite that goes on the bar nothing principle and has proven to the world that it is capable of any atrocity and engages in them with relish.
If another explanation that explains more of what we are witnessing and/or does so better is presented, I'll be the first to amend what I now think to be true based on a great deal of evidence that is none the less concrete and real because most people feel spacey when they encounter it.
I know it's scary. I know it's overwhelming. That does not make it untrue or unverifiable. That certainly does not release us from our being beholden to learn these facts and know just what we're up against.
I know it makes people feel crazy to think about this. I know why. The reason why is MK Ultra.
There is substantiation aplenty for every statement I made here - and vastly more.
I suggest you do the research yourselves. Doing the actual research goes a long way to undoing the effects of brainwashing that we have all been subjected to. Brainwashing can be erased. The process is slow and painful, but it can be done.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
You Tube Censored this Video
This is some of the information that Noam Chomsky is working so hard steering the Left's attention away from.
It was removed, then replaced. Messages people wrote in response to it were deleted.
It's called “Question Your Reality”.
http://www.infowars.com/?p=669&cp=17#comments
Now, if there's no reason to question our reality and if the claims were untrue, then why would You Tube, owned by Google, have censored it?
D2
This is some of the information that Noam Chomsky is working so hard steering the Left's attention away from.
It was removed, then replaced. Messages people wrote in response to it were deleted.
It's called “Question Your Reality”.
http://www.infowars.com/?p=669&cp=17#comments
Now, if there's no reason to question our reality and if the claims were untrue, then why would You Tube, owned by Google, have censored it?
D2
Saturday, March 08, 2008
Thursday, March 06, 2008
Ah! So, This is Noam Chomsky
Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) NLP claims to help people change by teaching them to program their brains. We were given brains, we are told, but no instruction manual. NLP offers you a user-manual for the brain. The brain-manual seems to be a metaphor for NLP training, which is sometimes referred to as "software for the brain." Furthermore, NLP, consciously or unconsciously, relies heavily upon (1) the notion of the unconscious mind as constantly influencing conscious thought and action; (2) metaphorical behavior and speech, especially building upon the methods used in Freud's Interpretation of Dreams; and (3) hypnotherapy as developed by Milton Erickson. NLP is also heavily influenced by the work of Gregory Bateson and *Noam Chomsky*.
http://skepdic.com/neurolin.html
This certainly does explain why he's been so useful to MIT, the hothouse of the military-industrial complex, for four decades; why he commands a world-wide reputation and a salary enough to house him in Lexington, MA and his prodigious churning out of pseudo-Anarchist yada yada. Doesn't it?
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) NLP claims to help people change by teaching them to program their brains. We were given brains, we are told, but no instruction manual. NLP offers you a user-manual for the brain. The brain-manual seems to be a metaphor for NLP training, which is sometimes referred to as "software for the brain." Furthermore, NLP, consciously or unconsciously, relies heavily upon (1) the notion of the unconscious mind as constantly influencing conscious thought and action; (2) metaphorical behavior and speech, especially building upon the methods used in Freud's Interpretation of Dreams; and (3) hypnotherapy as developed by Milton Erickson. NLP is also heavily influenced by the work of Gregory Bateson and *Noam Chomsky*.
http://skepdic.com/neurolin.html
This certainly does explain why he's been so useful to MIT, the hothouse of the military-industrial complex, for four decades; why he commands a world-wide reputation and a salary enough to house him in Lexington, MA and his prodigious churning out of pseudo-Anarchist yada yada. Doesn't it?
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Israeli Editor Boasts: We Slant News
Typical of little people who must self-aggrandize, they gave out w-a-y too much self-incriminating information.
http://tinyurl.com/2dxqbj
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Typical of little people who must self-aggrandize, they gave out w-a-y too much self-incriminating information.
http://tinyurl.com/2dxqbj
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Tuesday, March 04, 2008
Esoteric Agenda
A video entitled in "Esoteric Agenda" is *packed* with critical information.
http://tinyurl.com/3dnbun
Of course, as always, remain critical and skeptical, even of the critical and skeptical.
I believe that we are entering an age of new promise and freedom and conditions in which we can be truly and gradually grow to be fully Human, this despite the apparent gloom.
Compared to the power that exists in the universe, the power of the "elite" is really a joke and they are being used as the instruments to bring about a greater good.
D2
A video entitled in "Esoteric Agenda" is *packed* with critical information.
http://tinyurl.com/3dnbun
Of course, as always, remain critical and skeptical, even of the critical and skeptical.
I believe that we are entering an age of new promise and freedom and conditions in which we can be truly and gradually grow to be fully Human, this despite the apparent gloom.
Compared to the power that exists in the universe, the power of the "elite" is really a joke and they are being used as the instruments to bring about a greater good.
D2
Thursday, February 28, 2008
While the precise details of how the Rothschilds work behind the scenes are, in the main, matters of conjecture and circumstantial evidence, and are thus rarely documented exactly, much of what Makow says is in accordance with my position exactly.
Of course, it is not true that "the Zionists" took over American government.
It is true that the Rothschilds, one of the guises of whom, and one of the operatives of whom, are the Zionists, is in control of world government. They seized that control long before the time of Theodore Herzl.
Neither do I credit them with calling them "Illuminati". That is their soi-disant self-aggrandizing designation.
I call them what Alex Jones calls them - scum.
D2
"The Worst Anti-Semites Are Zionists
by HENRY MAKOW
(Nov 28, 2007) The worst anti-Semites are Zionists who create anti-Semitism and use it to dupe and coerce Jews into advancing the Illuminati bankers' plan for world government dictatorship.
In the past, I have argued that Zionism is a protection racket and conspiracy against Jews. Today, I will suggest they have suppressed normal Jewish cultural/spiritual expression and hijacked the Jewish people to serve their perverted cause.
Before Zionists took over the US government, they took over the American Jewish community and made it their instrument.Henry Hurwitz's "Menorah Journal" and Menorah Societies were an attempt by American Jewry to see itself culturally and spiritually as an end in itself, rather than a means to serve and support the "Jewish homeland." Zionists suppressed this free and democratic group, in the same way as they are depriving all Americans of their political and cultural freedom.
THE MENORAH SOCIETY
Henry Hurwitz started the first Menorah Society at Harvard University in 1906 and "The Menorah Journal" in 1915. The Menorah movement stood "for the study and advancement of Jewish culture and ideals in America." By the end of the First World War, the movement had expanded to include the Intercollegiate Menorah Association, Summer School, Education Conference and Board of Lecturers.Essentially the movement fostered non-dogmatic non-political study of Jewish history, spirit and culture. It was open to different points of view and initially received support from the central bankers. But when Hurwitz insisted that Judaism had nothing to do with Zionism, and Jews ought to feel perfectly at home in America, the bankers froze the Menorah movement's charitable funding.
In 1958, Hurwitz wrote a friend, "We have had more than one coy proposal from this and that wealthy organization to take us over. Our financial problems would then be 'solved.'And our freedom--that is, our true life--dissolved." (Menuhin, The Decadence of Judaism in Our Time, 1965. p.366)In the Autumn-Winter 1959 issue of the "Menorah Journal," Hurwitz describes the effect of "bigotry" i.e. Zionist banker control of organized Jewry."This bigotry strikes beyond one old established independent organization and its magazine, which have perhaps rendered some service to Judaism through more than half a century. This bigotry poisons the air of Jewish communal life in America. It tries to suppress...the basic American principles of free speech and free press. It penalizes honest analysis [of those] who control the Jewish public tax-exempt philanthropic funds, and hence have the power to enrich favorite organizations, while starving others that do not bend the knees...Thus, they actually hinder here a rational long-view consideration of the best interests of the people of Israel themselves." Moreover, as is well known, a very large proportion of the supposedly voluntary philanthropic donations are extracted from business and professional men on threats of punitive economic and social sanctions. This must be described as what it is--a species of terrorism. Such terrorism has become a most effective technique in large Jewish fund raising." (Menuhin, p. 367)Unfortunately the Menorah movement died with its founder in 1961. Its work was partly continued by the American Council for Judaism , under its dynamic founder Rabbi Elmer Berger (1908-1996.) In 1965, Moshe Menuhin characterized American Jewish life in the following terms:"Today in America, Jewish culture and even Jewish religion has degenerated into 'Jewish' nationalism, and Jewish philanthropists, Jewish schools, Jewish segregated services, have been all subverted (with a few noble exceptions) into serving...the up building of the 'Jewish homeland'...(468)(A measure of this: Moshe Menuhin had to self-publish his book.)
CONSEQUENCES
My guess is that American Jewry is about evenly divided : half is alienated from all things Jewish; half is under the control of organized Jewry, i.e. the central banking cartel. This cartel, synonymous with the name Rothschild, is behind all major wars and depressions of the past 300 years, behind Communism, Fascism and the Holocaust, behind 9-11 and the bogus war on terror. Nothing in this world happens without money and they control government credit.They need to enslave us to protect this world monopoly. Their goal is to remake mankind into a slave race by destroying the basis of our humanity: nationhood, religion (God), race and family.This enemy sits at the heart of our political, financial and cultural life. It has co-opted all groups in the same way as it has co-opted Jews. However, organized Jewry is leading the assault on our freedom. The Masonic B'nai Brith is behind the "hate speech" legislation and Bill S 1959 which would treat their political opponents as if they were "anti-Semites" and "terrorists."The bankers are the real terrorists. They organized 9-11 using the secret services and they are behind "Al Queda." They may be planning another world war starting with a conflagration between Israel and Iran.They are also the real anti-Semites. They have sacrificed Jews to their agenda before (Communism, Nazism, Zionism) and will do so again. All Jews will be blamed for the New World Order, even though half are indifferent, and the other half are willing dupes.While I was writing this article, I got an email from a reader who said he had just given a Jewish friend "Hell.""I don't know if this means anything but I'm tired of feeling powerless to all these bastards and if I can make them eat some of their own shit...good. I also told him that Jews aren't stupid and if we had quit giving money to Israel 30 yrs ago there may be peace over there. Well, it's done and a little "Fuck Me...Fuck YOU!!" ain't bad..I'm just a redneck at heart I guess."It's time that Jews realized that anti-Semitism is caused by the bankers' megalomanical agenda and is used to implicate and blame ordinary Jews. The bankers hate real Jews and real Judaism. They would never have created Israel if it were just a "Jewish homeland." It is their private fiefdom, army and nuclear arsenal, part of their agenda for world government and world war. Jews are just pawns in their game.It's time ordinary Jews stopped defending the bankers (which confirms everyone's worst suspicions.) It's time we took Henry Hurwitz's example, and stood shoulder-to- shoulder with our fellow Americans in the fight of our lives.
*** Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of "Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order." (www.cruelhoax.ca) His articles can be found at his web site www.henrymakow.com He enjoys receiving comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com"
Of course, it is not true that "the Zionists" took over American government.
It is true that the Rothschilds, one of the guises of whom, and one of the operatives of whom, are the Zionists, is in control of world government. They seized that control long before the time of Theodore Herzl.
Neither do I credit them with calling them "Illuminati". That is their soi-disant self-aggrandizing designation.
I call them what Alex Jones calls them - scum.
D2
"The Worst Anti-Semites Are Zionists
by HENRY MAKOW
(Nov 28, 2007) The worst anti-Semites are Zionists who create anti-Semitism and use it to dupe and coerce Jews into advancing the Illuminati bankers' plan for world government dictatorship.
In the past, I have argued that Zionism is a protection racket and conspiracy against Jews. Today, I will suggest they have suppressed normal Jewish cultural/spiritual expression and hijacked the Jewish people to serve their perverted cause.
Before Zionists took over the US government, they took over the American Jewish community and made it their instrument.Henry Hurwitz's "Menorah Journal" and Menorah Societies were an attempt by American Jewry to see itself culturally and spiritually as an end in itself, rather than a means to serve and support the "Jewish homeland." Zionists suppressed this free and democratic group, in the same way as they are depriving all Americans of their political and cultural freedom.
THE MENORAH SOCIETY
Henry Hurwitz started the first Menorah Society at Harvard University in 1906 and "The Menorah Journal" in 1915. The Menorah movement stood "for the study and advancement of Jewish culture and ideals in America." By the end of the First World War, the movement had expanded to include the Intercollegiate Menorah Association, Summer School, Education Conference and Board of Lecturers.Essentially the movement fostered non-dogmatic non-political study of Jewish history, spirit and culture. It was open to different points of view and initially received support from the central bankers. But when Hurwitz insisted that Judaism had nothing to do with Zionism, and Jews ought to feel perfectly at home in America, the bankers froze the Menorah movement's charitable funding.
In 1958, Hurwitz wrote a friend, "We have had more than one coy proposal from this and that wealthy organization to take us over. Our financial problems would then be 'solved.'And our freedom--that is, our true life--dissolved." (Menuhin, The Decadence of Judaism in Our Time, 1965. p.366)In the Autumn-Winter 1959 issue of the "Menorah Journal," Hurwitz describes the effect of "bigotry" i.e. Zionist banker control of organized Jewry."This bigotry strikes beyond one old established independent organization and its magazine, which have perhaps rendered some service to Judaism through more than half a century. This bigotry poisons the air of Jewish communal life in America. It tries to suppress...the basic American principles of free speech and free press. It penalizes honest analysis [of those] who control the Jewish public tax-exempt philanthropic funds, and hence have the power to enrich favorite organizations, while starving others that do not bend the knees...Thus, they actually hinder here a rational long-view consideration of the best interests of the people of Israel themselves." Moreover, as is well known, a very large proportion of the supposedly voluntary philanthropic donations are extracted from business and professional men on threats of punitive economic and social sanctions. This must be described as what it is--a species of terrorism. Such terrorism has become a most effective technique in large Jewish fund raising." (Menuhin, p. 367)Unfortunately the Menorah movement died with its founder in 1961. Its work was partly continued by the American Council for Judaism , under its dynamic founder Rabbi Elmer Berger (1908-1996.) In 1965, Moshe Menuhin characterized American Jewish life in the following terms:"Today in America, Jewish culture and even Jewish religion has degenerated into 'Jewish' nationalism, and Jewish philanthropists, Jewish schools, Jewish segregated services, have been all subverted (with a few noble exceptions) into serving...the up building of the 'Jewish homeland'...(468)(A measure of this: Moshe Menuhin had to self-publish his book.)
CONSEQUENCES
My guess is that American Jewry is about evenly divided : half is alienated from all things Jewish; half is under the control of organized Jewry, i.e. the central banking cartel. This cartel, synonymous with the name Rothschild, is behind all major wars and depressions of the past 300 years, behind Communism, Fascism and the Holocaust, behind 9-11 and the bogus war on terror. Nothing in this world happens without money and they control government credit.They need to enslave us to protect this world monopoly. Their goal is to remake mankind into a slave race by destroying the basis of our humanity: nationhood, religion (God), race and family.This enemy sits at the heart of our political, financial and cultural life. It has co-opted all groups in the same way as it has co-opted Jews. However, organized Jewry is leading the assault on our freedom. The Masonic B'nai Brith is behind the "hate speech" legislation and Bill S 1959 which would treat their political opponents as if they were "anti-Semites" and "terrorists."The bankers are the real terrorists. They organized 9-11 using the secret services and they are behind "Al Queda." They may be planning another world war starting with a conflagration between Israel and Iran.They are also the real anti-Semites. They have sacrificed Jews to their agenda before (Communism, Nazism, Zionism) and will do so again. All Jews will be blamed for the New World Order, even though half are indifferent, and the other half are willing dupes.While I was writing this article, I got an email from a reader who said he had just given a Jewish friend "Hell.""I don't know if this means anything but I'm tired of feeling powerless to all these bastards and if I can make them eat some of their own shit...good. I also told him that Jews aren't stupid and if we had quit giving money to Israel 30 yrs ago there may be peace over there. Well, it's done and a little "Fuck Me...Fuck YOU!!" ain't bad..I'm just a redneck at heart I guess."It's time that Jews realized that anti-Semitism is caused by the bankers' megalomanical agenda and is used to implicate and blame ordinary Jews. The bankers hate real Jews and real Judaism. They would never have created Israel if it were just a "Jewish homeland." It is their private fiefdom, army and nuclear arsenal, part of their agenda for world government and world war. Jews are just pawns in their game.It's time ordinary Jews stopped defending the bankers (which confirms everyone's worst suspicions.) It's time we took Henry Hurwitz's example, and stood shoulder-to- shoulder with our fellow Americans in the fight of our lives.
*** Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of "Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order." (www.cruelhoax.ca) His articles can be found at his web site www.henrymakow.com He enjoys receiving comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com"
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Excommunicate the Rothschilds
Having spent quite an amount of time researching the Rothschild family, my considered opinion is that the most important single thing that the Jewish People can do is to disavow and excommunicate the Rothschild family - and do it very publicly and very pointedly.
Compared to what they have done, and are doing, the Jews who have been excommunicated were saints.
Excommunication involves not so much as acknowledging their existence and not having any dealings with them whatsoever.
Let us reject their "presents", for they are naught but Trojan horses.
The more you research the Rothschilds and the more you see the damage that they have done and are doing to the Jewish People and their utter depravity, the clearer it will become why this is the singly most essential step that we can take - and it is something that only the Jewish People can do.
I guarantee that doing this will immediately gain the respect and the support of countless people all over the globe.
I cannot begin to express how much this will do for the reinstatement of the Jewish People in the eyes of the world as part of the Brotherhood of Man and how much this will do to advance world peace.
When you see for yourself what they are, you will understand why this is critical.
We must no longer cooperate with the destruction they are heaping upon the Jewish People and upon the world.
If we continue to cooperate with them, we will continue to die en masse at their hands in whatever anti-Semitic war they fancy to create and those of us who live will continue to be pariah and despicable in the eyes of the world.
Finally, look at this:
Hitler's grandmother, Maria Anna Schicklgruber, was raped by Baron Rothschild when she worked as a maid in his castle in Vienna.
Source: http://www.reformation.org/habsburgs.html
Meet the Real Adolf Hitler!!
Hitler was a Rothschild!!
Source: http://www.reformation.org/adolf-hitler.html
"The third possibility is that Adolf Hitler's grandfather was Jewish. Rumours to that effect circulated in Munich cafes in the early 1920s, and were fostered by sensationalist journalism of the foreign press during the 1930s. It was suggested that the name `Huttler' was Jewish, `revealed' that he could be traced to a Jewish family called Hitler in Bucharest, and even claimed that his father had been sired by Baron Rothschild, in whose house in Vienna his grandmother had allegedly spent some time as a servant."
http://partners.nytimes.com/books/first/k/kershaw-hitler.html
"According to a book by a psychoanalyst, Walter Langer, called The Mind of Hitler, not only was Hitler supported by the Rothschilds, he WAS a Rothschild. This revelation fits like a glove with the actions of the Rothschilds and other Illuminati bloodlines in Germany who brought Hitler to the fore as dictator of that nation. He was also supported by the British Royal Family, the House of Windsor (in truth the German House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha), and these included the British royal "war hero", Lord Mountbatten, a Rothschild and a Satanist."
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_rothschild04.htm
There are more sources that contend the same thing.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan
Having spent quite an amount of time researching the Rothschild family, my considered opinion is that the most important single thing that the Jewish People can do is to disavow and excommunicate the Rothschild family - and do it very publicly and very pointedly.
Compared to what they have done, and are doing, the Jews who have been excommunicated were saints.
Excommunication involves not so much as acknowledging their existence and not having any dealings with them whatsoever.
Let us reject their "presents", for they are naught but Trojan horses.
The more you research the Rothschilds and the more you see the damage that they have done and are doing to the Jewish People and their utter depravity, the clearer it will become why this is the singly most essential step that we can take - and it is something that only the Jewish People can do.
I guarantee that doing this will immediately gain the respect and the support of countless people all over the globe.
I cannot begin to express how much this will do for the reinstatement of the Jewish People in the eyes of the world as part of the Brotherhood of Man and how much this will do to advance world peace.
When you see for yourself what they are, you will understand why this is critical.
We must no longer cooperate with the destruction they are heaping upon the Jewish People and upon the world.
If we continue to cooperate with them, we will continue to die en masse at their hands in whatever anti-Semitic war they fancy to create and those of us who live will continue to be pariah and despicable in the eyes of the world.
Finally, look at this:
Hitler's grandmother, Maria Anna Schicklgruber, was raped by Baron Rothschild when she worked as a maid in his castle in Vienna.
Source: http://www.reformation.org/habsburgs.html
Meet the Real Adolf Hitler!!
Hitler was a Rothschild!!
Source: http://www.reformation.org/adolf-hitler.html
"The third possibility is that Adolf Hitler's grandfather was Jewish. Rumours to that effect circulated in Munich cafes in the early 1920s, and were fostered by sensationalist journalism of the foreign press during the 1930s. It was suggested that the name `Huttler' was Jewish, `revealed' that he could be traced to a Jewish family called Hitler in Bucharest, and even claimed that his father had been sired by Baron Rothschild, in whose house in Vienna his grandmother had allegedly spent some time as a servant."
http://partners.nytimes.com/books/first/k/kershaw-hitler.html
"According to a book by a psychoanalyst, Walter Langer, called The Mind of Hitler, not only was Hitler supported by the Rothschilds, he WAS a Rothschild. This revelation fits like a glove with the actions of the Rothschilds and other Illuminati bloodlines in Germany who brought Hitler to the fore as dictator of that nation. He was also supported by the British Royal Family, the House of Windsor (in truth the German House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha), and these included the British royal "war hero", Lord Mountbatten, a Rothschild and a Satanist."
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_rothschild04.htm
There are more sources that contend the same thing.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
The Lubavitcher Rebbe - Phony as a $1
The Lubavitcher Rebbe handing out $1 bills to people always bothered me.
After seeing this video, it bothers me even more:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEenyyiQGGQ
Supposedly, he gave the $1 bills to people to encourage them to give tzeddakah (charity).
Are we to believe that those people never gave $1 worth of tzeddakah until he prompted them to?
And the only way that he could get them to give tzeddakah was by giving them $1 bills.
They wouldn't have done it at his request or as a result of him explaining the importance of tzeddakah. Of course not. He had to give them $1 bills to show them how to hand out a bill.
That wasn't very good education, because if they copied him like chimpanzees, as ChaBa"D Chassidim are wont to do, and gave out a $1 bill, just as he had given them, they would be back to where they started before he gave them the $1.
But we must assume they were taught to give out more than that by the Rebbe.
Certainly they wouldn't have given tzeddakah from their own desire to give tzeddakah, or as a result of reading the teachings of other Rabbis and their parents.
No, they had, absolutely had, to have a $1 bill handed to them in order to understand and do the mitzvah of tzeddakah. There simply is no other way to teach the mitzvah.
But wait, they didn't give those dollars that he gave them away. They kept them, because the Rebbe had given them to them and they wanted a holy memento from the Rebbe.
Trouble is, all those dollars have all-seeing eye in the pyramid emblazoned on them, which are ancient symbols of avodah zara – idol worhship.
And, if you describe a Jewish star around the pyramid on the dollar bill, the points point to the letters M A S O and, you guessed it, N, within the Latin expressions around the pyramid, including the one that says Novus Ordo Seclorum - New World Order.
Here is the symbol I am referring to:
http://www.geocities.com/endtimedeception/seal.htm
Notice that the name MASON only has five letters.
So, only five points on the Star of David can point to those letters.
A star with five points is a pentagram - a very Satanic symbol indeed.
And so, what happened is that the Rebbe insured by giving those $1 bills away that thousands of Jews would have a permanent symbol of the all-seeing eye in the pyramid with them at all times.
And let's not forget the "minhag" of pouring a drop of "the Rebbe's vodka" from a "farbrengin" into bottle after bottle of vodka to make it holy. L'Cha'im! L'Cha'im!
I wish to say unequivocally that the vast majority of the followers of ChaBa"D are completely innocent and trusted their Rebbe implicitly.
They were foolishly duped into a cult, but they did so innocently.
They were, and are, fools, but they are innocent.
From the very first time I read the Tanya I knew something was wrong with it, very wrong.
It is a sin to tell people they are spiritually relegated to be "beinoni'im".
No one has the right to put a lid on another's spiritual advancement or potential.
We must believe that everyone can be a Tzaddik. And we must project that belief to everyone.
Can there be a worse heresy than saying that a human being is Ein Sof b'guf – Ein Sof personified?
Can anyone deny that having pictures of him everywhere, including in synagogues, is not a Jewish practice?
I, for one, knew there was something wrong with the Rebbe cult from the beginning and during the one time I saw the Rebbe in person I felt bad energy emanating from him.
I knew that ChaBa"D is not kosher and, as is known, I left.
Judaism has been imbued with the worst of the worst avodah zarah.
Face this fact!
The Jewish people have been targeted in the worst way for Masonic mind muck.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
The Lubavitcher Rebbe handing out $1 bills to people always bothered me.
After seeing this video, it bothers me even more:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEenyyiQGGQ
Supposedly, he gave the $1 bills to people to encourage them to give tzeddakah (charity).
Are we to believe that those people never gave $1 worth of tzeddakah until he prompted them to?
And the only way that he could get them to give tzeddakah was by giving them $1 bills.
They wouldn't have done it at his request or as a result of him explaining the importance of tzeddakah. Of course not. He had to give them $1 bills to show them how to hand out a bill.
That wasn't very good education, because if they copied him like chimpanzees, as ChaBa"D Chassidim are wont to do, and gave out a $1 bill, just as he had given them, they would be back to where they started before he gave them the $1.
But we must assume they were taught to give out more than that by the Rebbe.
Certainly they wouldn't have given tzeddakah from their own desire to give tzeddakah, or as a result of reading the teachings of other Rabbis and their parents.
No, they had, absolutely had, to have a $1 bill handed to them in order to understand and do the mitzvah of tzeddakah. There simply is no other way to teach the mitzvah.
But wait, they didn't give those dollars that he gave them away. They kept them, because the Rebbe had given them to them and they wanted a holy memento from the Rebbe.
Trouble is, all those dollars have all-seeing eye in the pyramid emblazoned on them, which are ancient symbols of avodah zara – idol worhship.
And, if you describe a Jewish star around the pyramid on the dollar bill, the points point to the letters M A S O and, you guessed it, N, within the Latin expressions around the pyramid, including the one that says Novus Ordo Seclorum - New World Order.
Here is the symbol I am referring to:
http://www.geocities.com/endtimedeception/seal.htm
Notice that the name MASON only has five letters.
So, only five points on the Star of David can point to those letters.
A star with five points is a pentagram - a very Satanic symbol indeed.
And so, what happened is that the Rebbe insured by giving those $1 bills away that thousands of Jews would have a permanent symbol of the all-seeing eye in the pyramid with them at all times.
And let's not forget the "minhag" of pouring a drop of "the Rebbe's vodka" from a "farbrengin" into bottle after bottle of vodka to make it holy. L'Cha'im! L'Cha'im!
I wish to say unequivocally that the vast majority of the followers of ChaBa"D are completely innocent and trusted their Rebbe implicitly.
They were foolishly duped into a cult, but they did so innocently.
They were, and are, fools, but they are innocent.
From the very first time I read the Tanya I knew something was wrong with it, very wrong.
It is a sin to tell people they are spiritually relegated to be "beinoni'im".
No one has the right to put a lid on another's spiritual advancement or potential.
We must believe that everyone can be a Tzaddik. And we must project that belief to everyone.
Can there be a worse heresy than saying that a human being is Ein Sof b'guf – Ein Sof personified?
Can anyone deny that having pictures of him everywhere, including in synagogues, is not a Jewish practice?
I, for one, knew there was something wrong with the Rebbe cult from the beginning and during the one time I saw the Rebbe in person I felt bad energy emanating from him.
I knew that ChaBa"D is not kosher and, as is known, I left.
Judaism has been imbued with the worst of the worst avodah zarah.
Face this fact!
The Jewish people have been targeted in the worst way for Masonic mind muck.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Monday, February 25, 2008
The Supreme Masonic Temple of the State of Israel
The Supreme Court of the State of Israel:
http://freemasonrywatch.org/israeli_secrets_barrychamish.html
Illuminati Design And Symbolism In The Israeli Supreme Court Building
http://www.planetquo.com/Illuminati-Design-And-Symbolism-In-The-Israeli-Supreme-Court-Building
Rothschild The Israeli Supreme Court Building And The New World Order
http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/rothschild__the_israeli_supreme.htm
Why are ChaBa"D-Lubavitch so chummy with so many world leaders, whom we know to be deep "into it?
http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/jews_of_the_world.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17CRVGojwic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xc3MpzhAN8&feature=related
Check out pyramid at 24 seconds and the ceiling at 29 seconds into the next video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZhK5N3Axus&feature=related
Their claims that the Temple of Jerusalem is Masonic, the Grand Lodge in Tel Aviv and Bro Moses Montefiori:
http://www.geocities.com/fmisrael/gallery.html
OK. Now we know that it's deep in the state of Israel. Now we know this is not a Jewish state, but a Masonic state.
There's a limit to how much one can learn about this for learning sake before it starts to psych one out.
***What do we do about it?***
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
The Supreme Court of the State of Israel:
http://freemasonrywatch.org/israeli_secrets_barrychamish.html
Illuminati Design And Symbolism In The Israeli Supreme Court Building
http://www.planetquo.com/Illuminati-Design-And-Symbolism-In-The-Israeli-Supreme-Court-Building
Rothschild The Israeli Supreme Court Building And The New World Order
http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/rothschild__the_israeli_supreme.htm
Why are ChaBa"D-Lubavitch so chummy with so many world leaders, whom we know to be deep "into it?
http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/jews_of_the_world.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17CRVGojwic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xc3MpzhAN8&feature=related
Check out pyramid at 24 seconds and the ceiling at 29 seconds into the next video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZhK5N3Axus&feature=related
Their claims that the Temple of Jerusalem is Masonic, the Grand Lodge in Tel Aviv and Bro Moses Montefiori:
http://www.geocities.com/fmisrael/gallery.html
OK. Now we know that it's deep in the state of Israel. Now we know this is not a Jewish state, but a Masonic state.
There's a limit to how much one can learn about this for learning sake before it starts to psych one out.
***What do we do about it?***
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Concentration Camps in the US – Now Official, Mainstream News
Many of us have been aware of the information that I'm going to provide for you on the following links for some time.
However, as it was only activists who were open to this information who were considering it and asking ourselves what to do about it; I did not disseminate it widely as I knew it would be rejected by the mainstream.
Well, former Congressman Daniel Hamburg made this information an issue for the mainstream recently. He is extremely brave for doing so and his contribution is invaluable.
Rule by Fear or Rule by Law?
Lewis Seiler,Dan Hamburg
http://tinyurl.com/2h7fu4
Former Congressman Warns Of Martial Law Camps In America
Follow the links on this site. They lead to information you must know about.
http://tinyurl.com/3779cl
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Many of us have been aware of the information that I'm going to provide for you on the following links for some time.
However, as it was only activists who were open to this information who were considering it and asking ourselves what to do about it; I did not disseminate it widely as I knew it would be rejected by the mainstream.
Well, former Congressman Daniel Hamburg made this information an issue for the mainstream recently. He is extremely brave for doing so and his contribution is invaluable.
Rule by Fear or Rule by Law?
Lewis Seiler,Dan Hamburg
http://tinyurl.com/2h7fu4
Former Congressman Warns Of Martial Law Camps In America
Follow the links on this site. They lead to information you must know about.
http://tinyurl.com/3779cl
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Monday, February 18, 2008
C-O-U-N-T-D-O-W-N
Something very, very critical is transpiring in the US.
It is either the beginning of the beginning or the beginning of the end.
The Democrats have closed down the House in response to Bush trying to get the FISA bill extended and retroactive immunity for companies like AT&T and Verizon.
The background is to be found on this site:
http://tinyurl.com/2gm45a
Either Boehner and the Republicans used the discussion as an excuse to avoid voting on the extension of the FISA bill and immunity for companies spying...
Or...they used it as an excuse to do away with due process and have martial law declared...
Keith Olbermann refers to these developments when he calls Bush a fascist outright and generally spills Bush's guts on the floor in the video entitled "Mr. Bush You Are a Fascist", which can be found in the rightmost column on this site:
http://www.opednews.com/
D2
Something very, very critical is transpiring in the US.
It is either the beginning of the beginning or the beginning of the end.
The Democrats have closed down the House in response to Bush trying to get the FISA bill extended and retroactive immunity for companies like AT&T and Verizon.
The background is to be found on this site:
http://tinyurl.com/2gm45a
Either Boehner and the Republicans used the discussion as an excuse to avoid voting on the extension of the FISA bill and immunity for companies spying...
Or...they used it as an excuse to do away with due process and have martial law declared...
Keith Olbermann refers to these developments when he calls Bush a fascist outright and generally spills Bush's guts on the floor in the video entitled "Mr. Bush You Are a Fascist", which can be found in the rightmost column on this site:
http://www.opednews.com/
D2
The Conspiracy Theory of History Revisited" by Rothbard
Far be it from me to endorse an Anarcho-Capitalist, to me that's the ultimate in doublethink, but ol' Murray was right on the money, so to speak, with this one.
As my Great Aunts used to say: "the true is the true", no matter whose mouth it issues from and one has to be some kind of damn fool to reject the truth just because it comes from someone who is not our favorite political flavor.
http://www.mises.org/story/2809
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Far be it from me to endorse an Anarcho-Capitalist, to me that's the ultimate in doublethink, but ol' Murray was right on the money, so to speak, with this one.
As my Great Aunts used to say: "the true is the true", no matter whose mouth it issues from and one has to be some kind of damn fool to reject the truth just because it comes from someone who is not our favorite political flavor.
http://www.mises.org/story/2809
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Friday, February 15, 2008
Police State Total Enslavement
The video "Police State III" is packed with essential information.
For the time being, it doesn't matter *at all* that Jones is a Constitutionalist, not an Anarchist.
There are matters at hand so grave, so immediately threatening that we must band together with whoever is Humanist enough to understand the depth and import of what is transpiring.
The issue is, as Jones articulates it so very well: Total Enslavement.
When faced with total enslavement, we cannot afford to pick ideological nits.
He's a deeply concerned, deeply involved Human being who is providing essential information everyone needs to know about business and gov't gratis.
Only fools and the brainwashed would reject what he has to say because he's not of their specific political stripe and flavor.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
The video "Police State III" is packed with essential information.
For the time being, it doesn't matter *at all* that Jones is a Constitutionalist, not an Anarchist.
There are matters at hand so grave, so immediately threatening that we must band together with whoever is Humanist enough to understand the depth and import of what is transpiring.
The issue is, as Jones articulates it so very well: Total Enslavement.
When faced with total enslavement, we cannot afford to pick ideological nits.
He's a deeply concerned, deeply involved Human being who is providing essential information everyone needs to know about business and gov't gratis.
Only fools and the brainwashed would reject what he has to say because he's not of their specific political stripe and flavor.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Thursday, February 14, 2008
"Endgame": The Information Every Anarchist Needs
"Endgame" is an extremely important video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25yhygUkecE&feature=related
Agents planted in the Anarchist movement are telling people that this is "conspiracy theory". No, it's not. It's business as usual. As you'll hear in the video, it is GW Bush (or Busche, as his family originally spelled their name) himself who refers to this information as "conspiracy theories".
I've been thrown off Anarchy list after Anarchy list for exposing this information. Agents in the Anarchist movement don't want you aware of this.
Most Anarchists aren't aware that they have been co-opted and recuperated. The assumption is that Anarchy is so radical that it can't possibly have been pre-empted. Wrong. Long ago, a diluted, capitalist-sanctioned "Anarchy" was crafted and most go along with that line. There are very few real radicals in the Anarchist movement today.
AnCap is nothing but sold-out Anarchy.
I invite you to become a true Anarchist.
The information in "Endgame" is crucial to understanding how critically important the anti-capitalist forms of Anarchy are if Humankind is to escape the plan already set into motion.
They use the lame excuse that Alex Jones isn't an Anarchist. So, disregard whatever he says.
Only the stupid, and those with vested interests, aren't grateful for information this vitally important from wherever it comes.
This information is an explanation of just how important anti-capitalist forms of Anarchy are. Why?
Because this is what *any* ultra-rich, ultra-powerful elite will eventually arrive at simply because it is human nature that as we attain more and more wealth and power, we become inured. The ability to feel is gradually reduced as every want and desire is fulfilled.
Some want to kill of at least 5/6 of the Earth's population and enslave the rest and the really freaky among them want to destroy the planet entirely for a very simple reason: it's the only thing they haven't experienced yet. It's the only "kick" they haven't had. This is where "been there, done that" inevitably leads.
D2
"Endgame" is an extremely important video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25yhygUkecE&feature=related
Agents planted in the Anarchist movement are telling people that this is "conspiracy theory". No, it's not. It's business as usual. As you'll hear in the video, it is GW Bush (or Busche, as his family originally spelled their name) himself who refers to this information as "conspiracy theories".
I've been thrown off Anarchy list after Anarchy list for exposing this information. Agents in the Anarchist movement don't want you aware of this.
Most Anarchists aren't aware that they have been co-opted and recuperated. The assumption is that Anarchy is so radical that it can't possibly have been pre-empted. Wrong. Long ago, a diluted, capitalist-sanctioned "Anarchy" was crafted and most go along with that line. There are very few real radicals in the Anarchist movement today.
AnCap is nothing but sold-out Anarchy.
I invite you to become a true Anarchist.
The information in "Endgame" is crucial to understanding how critically important the anti-capitalist forms of Anarchy are if Humankind is to escape the plan already set into motion.
They use the lame excuse that Alex Jones isn't an Anarchist. So, disregard whatever he says.
Only the stupid, and those with vested interests, aren't grateful for information this vitally important from wherever it comes.
This information is an explanation of just how important anti-capitalist forms of Anarchy are. Why?
Because this is what *any* ultra-rich, ultra-powerful elite will eventually arrive at simply because it is human nature that as we attain more and more wealth and power, we become inured. The ability to feel is gradually reduced as every want and desire is fulfilled.
Some want to kill of at least 5/6 of the Earth's population and enslave the rest and the really freaky among them want to destroy the planet entirely for a very simple reason: it's the only thing they haven't experienced yet. It's the only "kick" they haven't had. This is where "been there, done that" inevitably leads.
D2
Monday, February 11, 2008
Exclusive! The FBI Deputizes Business
By Matthew Rothschild, February 7, 2008
Today, more than 23,000 representatives of private industry are working quietly with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. The members of this rapidly growing group, called InfraGard, receive secret warnings of terrorist threats before the public does—and, at least on one occasion, before elected officials. In return, they provide information to the government, which alarms the ACLU. But there may be more to it than that. One business executive, who showed me his InfraGard card, told me they have permission to “shoot to kill” in the event of martial law.InfraGard is “a child of the FBI,” says Michael Hershman, the chairman of the advisory board of the InfraGard National Members Alliance and CEO of the Fairfax Group, an international consulting firm.
InfraGard started in Cleveland back in 1996, when the private sector there cooperated with the FBI to investigate cyber threats.
“Then the FBI cloned it,” says Phyllis Schneck, chairman of the board of directors of the InfraGard National Members Alliance, and the prime mover behind the growth of InfraGard over the last several years.
InfraGard itself is still an FBI operation, with FBI agents in each state overseeing the local InfraGard chapters. (There are now eighty-six of them.) The alliance is a nonprofit organization of private sector InfraGard members.
“We are the owners, operators, and experts of our critical infrastructure, from the CEO of a large company in agriculture or high finance to the guy who turns the valve at the water utility,” says Schneck, who by day is the vice president of research integration at Secure Computing.
“At its most basic level, InfraGard is a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the private sector,” the InfraGard website states. “InfraGard chapters are geographically linked with FBI Field Office territories.”
In November 2001, InfraGard had around 1,700 members. As of late January, InfraGard had 23,682 members, according to its website, www.infragard.net, which adds that “350 of our nation’s Fortune 500 have a representative in InfraGard.”
To join, each person must be sponsored by “an existing InfraGard member, chapter, or partner organization.” The FBI then vets the applicant. On the application form, prospective members are asked which aspect of the critical infrastructure their organization deals with. These include: agriculture, banking and finance, the chemical industry, defense, energy, food, information and telecommunications, law enforcement, public health, and transportation.
FBI Director Robert Mueller addressed an InfraGard convention on August 9, 2005. At that time, the group had less than half as many members as it does today. “To date, there are more than 11,000 members of InfraGard,” he said. “From our perspective that amounts to 11,000 contacts . . . and 11,000 partners in our mission to protect America.” He added a little later, “Those of you in the private sector are the first line of defense.”
He urged InfraGard members to contact the FBI if they “note suspicious activity or an unusual event.” And he said they could sic the FBI on “disgruntled employees who will use knowledge gained on the job against their employers.”
In an interview with InfraGard after the conference, which is featured prominently on the InfraGard members’ website, Mueller says: “It’s a great program.”
The ACLU is not so sanguine.
“There is evidence that InfraGard may be closer to a corporate TIPS program, turning private-sector corporations—some of which may be in a position to observe the activities of millions of individual customers—into surrogate eyes and ears for the FBI,” the ACLU warned in its August 2004 report The Surveillance-Industrial Complex: How the American Government Is Conscripting Businesses and Individuals in the Construction of a Surveillance Society.
InfraGard is not readily accessible to the general public. Its communications with the FBI and Homeland Security are beyond the reach of the Freedom of Information Act under the “trade secrets” exemption, its website says. And any conversation with the public or the media is supposed to be carefully rehearsed.
“The interests of InfraGard must be protected whenever presented to non-InfraGard members,” the website states. “During interviews with members of the press, controlling the image of InfraGard being presented can be difficult. Proper preparation for the interview will minimize the risk of embarrassment. . . . The InfraGard leadership and the local FBI representative should review the submitted questions, agree on the predilection of the answers, and identify the appropriate interviewee. . . . Tailor answers to the expected audience. . . . Questions concerning sensitive information should be avoided.”
One of the advantages of InfraGard, according to its leading members, is that the FBI gives them a heads-up on a secure portal about any threatening information related to infrastructure disruption or terrorism.
The InfraGard website advertises this. In its list of benefits of joining InfraGard, it states: “Gain access to an FBI secure communication network complete with VPN encrypted website, webmail, listservs, message boards, and much more.”
InfraGard members receive “almost daily updates” on threats “emanating from both domestic sources and overseas,” Hershman says.
“We get very easy access to secure information that only goes to InfraGard members,” Schneck says. “People are happy to be in the know.”
On November 1, 2001, the FBI had information about a potential threat to the bridges of California. The alert went out to the InfraGard membership. Enron was notified, and so, too, was Barry Davis, who worked for Morgan Stanley. He notified his brother Gray, the governor of California.
“He said his brother talked to him before the FBI,” recalls Steve Maviglio, who was Davis’s press secretary at the time. “And the governor got a lot of grief for releasing the information. In his defense, he said, ‘I was on the phone with my brother, who is an investment banker. And if he knows, why shouldn’t the public know?’ ”
Maviglio still sounds perturbed about this: “You’d think an elected official would be the first to know, not the last.”
In return for being in the know, InfraGard members cooperate with the FBI and Homeland Security. “InfraGard members have contributed to about 100 FBI cases,” Schneck says. “What InfraGard brings you is reach into the regional and local communities. We are a 22,000-member vetted body of subject-matter experts that reaches across seventeen matrixes. All the different stovepipes can connect with InfraGard.”
Schneck is proud of the relationships the InfraGard Members Alliance has built with the FBI. “If you had to call 1-800-FBI, you probably wouldn’t bother,” she says. “But if you knew Joe from a local meeting you had with him over a donut, you might call them. Either to give or to get. We want everyone to have a little black book.”
This black book may come in handy in times of an emergency. “On the back of each membership card,” Schneck says, “we have all the numbers you’d need: for Homeland Security, for the FBI, for the cyber center. And by calling up as an InfraGard member, you will be listened to.” She also says that members would have an easier time obtaining a “special telecommunications card that will enable your call to go through when others will not.”
This special status concerns the ACLU.
“The FBI should not be creating a privileged class of Americans who get special treatment,” says Jay Stanley, public education director of the ACLU’s technology and liberty program. “There’s no ‘business class’ in law enforcement. If there’s information the FBI can share with 22,000 corporate bigwigs, why don’t they just share it with the public? That’s who their real ‘special relationship’ is supposed to be with. Secrecy is not a party favor to be given out to friends. . . . This bears a disturbing resemblance to the FBI’s handing out ‘goodies’ to corporations in return for folding them into its domestic surveillance machinery.”
When the government raises its alert levels, InfraGard is in the loop. For instance, in a press release on February 7, 2003, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General announced that the national alert level was being raised from yellow to orange. They then listed “additional steps” that agencies were taking to “increase their protective measures.” One of those steps was to “provide alert information to InfraGard program.”
“They’re very much looped into our readiness capability,” says Amy Kudwa, spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security. “We provide speakers, as well as do joint presentations [with the FBI]. We also train alongside them, and they have participated in readiness exercises.”
On May 9, 2007, George Bush issued National Security Presidential Directive 51 entitled “National Continuity Policy.” In it, he instructed the Secretary of Homeland Security to coordinate with “private sector owners and operators of critical infrastructure, as appropriate, in order to provide for the delivery of essential services during an emergency.”
Asked if the InfraGard National Members Alliance was involved with these plans, Schneck said it was “not directly participating at this point.” Hershman, chairman of the group’s advisory board, however, said that it was.
InfraGard members, sometimes hundreds at a time, have been used in “national emergency preparation drills,” Schneck acknowledges.
“In case something happens, everybody is ready,” says Norm Arendt, the head of the Madison, Wisconsin, chapter of InfraGard, and the safety director for the consulting firm Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. “There’s been lots of discussions about what happens under an emergency.”
One business owner in the United States tells me that InfraGard members are being advised on how to prepare for a martial law situation—and what their role might be. He showed me his InfraGard card, with his name and e-mail address on the front, along with the InfraGard logo and its slogan, “Partnership for Protection.” On the back of the card were the emergency numbers that Schneck mentioned.
This business owner says he attended a small InfraGard meeting where agents of the FBI and Homeland Security discussed in astonishing detail what InfraGard members may be called upon to do.
“The meeting started off innocuously enough, with the speakers talking about corporate espionage,” he says. “From there, it just progressed. All of a sudden we were knee deep in what was expected of us when martial law is declared. We were expected to share all our resources, but in return we’d be given specific benefits.” These included, he says, the ability to travel in restricted areas and to get people out.But that’s not all.
“Then they said when—not if—martial law is declared, it was our responsibility to protect our portion of the infrastructure, and if we had to use deadly force to protect it, we couldn’t be prosecuted,” he says.
I was able to confirm that the meeting took place where he said it had, and that the FBI and Homeland Security did make presentations there. One InfraGard member who attended that meeting denies that the subject of lethal force came up. But the whistleblower is 100 percent certain of it. “I have nothing to gain by telling you this, and everything to lose,” he adds. “I’m so nervous about this, and I’m not someone who gets nervous.”
Though Schneck says that FBI and Homeland Security agents do make presentations to InfraGard, she denies that InfraGard members would have any civil patrol or law enforcement functions. “I have never heard of InfraGard members being told to use lethal force anywhere,” Schneck says.
The FBI adamantly denies it, also. “That’s ridiculous,” says Catherine Milhoan, an FBI spokesperson. “If you want to quote a businessperson saying that, knock yourself out. If that’s what you want to print, fine.”
But one other InfraGard member corroborated the whistleblower’s account, and another would not deny it.
Christine Moerke is a business continuity consultant for Alliant Energy in Madison, Wisconsin. She says she’s an InfraGard member, and she confirms that she has attended InfraGard meetings that went into the details about what kind of civil patrol function—including engaging in lethal force—that InfraGard members may be called upon to perform.
“There have been discussions like that, that I’ve heard of and participated in,” she says.
Curt Haugen is CEO of S’Curo Group, a company that does “strategic planning, business continuity planning and disaster recovery, physical and IT security, policy development, internal control, personnel selection, and travel safety,” according to its website. Haugen tells me he is a former FBI agent and that he has been an InfraGard member for many years. He is a huge booster. “It’s the only true organization where there is the public-private partnership,” he says. “It’s all who knows who. You know a face, you trust a face. That’s what makes it work.”
He says InfraGard “absolutely” does emergency preparedness exercises. When I ask about discussions the FBI and Homeland Security have had with InfraGard members about their use of lethal force, he says: “That much I cannot comment on. But as a private citizen, you have the right to use force if you feel threatened.”
“We were assured that if we were forced to kill someone to protect our infrastructure, there would be no repercussions,” the whistleblower says. “It gave me goose bumps. It chilled me to the bone.”
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine and the author of "You Have No Rights: Stories of America in an Age of Repression." This article, "The FBI Deputizes Business," is the cover story of the March issue
Source: http://tinyurl.com/yraxzj
Also see: http://www.infragard.net/
D2
By Matthew Rothschild, February 7, 2008
Today, more than 23,000 representatives of private industry are working quietly with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. The members of this rapidly growing group, called InfraGard, receive secret warnings of terrorist threats before the public does—and, at least on one occasion, before elected officials. In return, they provide information to the government, which alarms the ACLU. But there may be more to it than that. One business executive, who showed me his InfraGard card, told me they have permission to “shoot to kill” in the event of martial law.InfraGard is “a child of the FBI,” says Michael Hershman, the chairman of the advisory board of the InfraGard National Members Alliance and CEO of the Fairfax Group, an international consulting firm.
InfraGard started in Cleveland back in 1996, when the private sector there cooperated with the FBI to investigate cyber threats.
“Then the FBI cloned it,” says Phyllis Schneck, chairman of the board of directors of the InfraGard National Members Alliance, and the prime mover behind the growth of InfraGard over the last several years.
InfraGard itself is still an FBI operation, with FBI agents in each state overseeing the local InfraGard chapters. (There are now eighty-six of them.) The alliance is a nonprofit organization of private sector InfraGard members.
“We are the owners, operators, and experts of our critical infrastructure, from the CEO of a large company in agriculture or high finance to the guy who turns the valve at the water utility,” says Schneck, who by day is the vice president of research integration at Secure Computing.
“At its most basic level, InfraGard is a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the private sector,” the InfraGard website states. “InfraGard chapters are geographically linked with FBI Field Office territories.”
In November 2001, InfraGard had around 1,700 members. As of late January, InfraGard had 23,682 members, according to its website, www.infragard.net, which adds that “350 of our nation’s Fortune 500 have a representative in InfraGard.”
To join, each person must be sponsored by “an existing InfraGard member, chapter, or partner organization.” The FBI then vets the applicant. On the application form, prospective members are asked which aspect of the critical infrastructure their organization deals with. These include: agriculture, banking and finance, the chemical industry, defense, energy, food, information and telecommunications, law enforcement, public health, and transportation.
FBI Director Robert Mueller addressed an InfraGard convention on August 9, 2005. At that time, the group had less than half as many members as it does today. “To date, there are more than 11,000 members of InfraGard,” he said. “From our perspective that amounts to 11,000 contacts . . . and 11,000 partners in our mission to protect America.” He added a little later, “Those of you in the private sector are the first line of defense.”
He urged InfraGard members to contact the FBI if they “note suspicious activity or an unusual event.” And he said they could sic the FBI on “disgruntled employees who will use knowledge gained on the job against their employers.”
In an interview with InfraGard after the conference, which is featured prominently on the InfraGard members’ website, Mueller says: “It’s a great program.”
The ACLU is not so sanguine.
“There is evidence that InfraGard may be closer to a corporate TIPS program, turning private-sector corporations—some of which may be in a position to observe the activities of millions of individual customers—into surrogate eyes and ears for the FBI,” the ACLU warned in its August 2004 report The Surveillance-Industrial Complex: How the American Government Is Conscripting Businesses and Individuals in the Construction of a Surveillance Society.
InfraGard is not readily accessible to the general public. Its communications with the FBI and Homeland Security are beyond the reach of the Freedom of Information Act under the “trade secrets” exemption, its website says. And any conversation with the public or the media is supposed to be carefully rehearsed.
“The interests of InfraGard must be protected whenever presented to non-InfraGard members,” the website states. “During interviews with members of the press, controlling the image of InfraGard being presented can be difficult. Proper preparation for the interview will minimize the risk of embarrassment. . . . The InfraGard leadership and the local FBI representative should review the submitted questions, agree on the predilection of the answers, and identify the appropriate interviewee. . . . Tailor answers to the expected audience. . . . Questions concerning sensitive information should be avoided.”
One of the advantages of InfraGard, according to its leading members, is that the FBI gives them a heads-up on a secure portal about any threatening information related to infrastructure disruption or terrorism.
The InfraGard website advertises this. In its list of benefits of joining InfraGard, it states: “Gain access to an FBI secure communication network complete with VPN encrypted website, webmail, listservs, message boards, and much more.”
InfraGard members receive “almost daily updates” on threats “emanating from both domestic sources and overseas,” Hershman says.
“We get very easy access to secure information that only goes to InfraGard members,” Schneck says. “People are happy to be in the know.”
On November 1, 2001, the FBI had information about a potential threat to the bridges of California. The alert went out to the InfraGard membership. Enron was notified, and so, too, was Barry Davis, who worked for Morgan Stanley. He notified his brother Gray, the governor of California.
“He said his brother talked to him before the FBI,” recalls Steve Maviglio, who was Davis’s press secretary at the time. “And the governor got a lot of grief for releasing the information. In his defense, he said, ‘I was on the phone with my brother, who is an investment banker. And if he knows, why shouldn’t the public know?’ ”
Maviglio still sounds perturbed about this: “You’d think an elected official would be the first to know, not the last.”
In return for being in the know, InfraGard members cooperate with the FBI and Homeland Security. “InfraGard members have contributed to about 100 FBI cases,” Schneck says. “What InfraGard brings you is reach into the regional and local communities. We are a 22,000-member vetted body of subject-matter experts that reaches across seventeen matrixes. All the different stovepipes can connect with InfraGard.”
Schneck is proud of the relationships the InfraGard Members Alliance has built with the FBI. “If you had to call 1-800-FBI, you probably wouldn’t bother,” she says. “But if you knew Joe from a local meeting you had with him over a donut, you might call them. Either to give or to get. We want everyone to have a little black book.”
This black book may come in handy in times of an emergency. “On the back of each membership card,” Schneck says, “we have all the numbers you’d need: for Homeland Security, for the FBI, for the cyber center. And by calling up as an InfraGard member, you will be listened to.” She also says that members would have an easier time obtaining a “special telecommunications card that will enable your call to go through when others will not.”
This special status concerns the ACLU.
“The FBI should not be creating a privileged class of Americans who get special treatment,” says Jay Stanley, public education director of the ACLU’s technology and liberty program. “There’s no ‘business class’ in law enforcement. If there’s information the FBI can share with 22,000 corporate bigwigs, why don’t they just share it with the public? That’s who their real ‘special relationship’ is supposed to be with. Secrecy is not a party favor to be given out to friends. . . . This bears a disturbing resemblance to the FBI’s handing out ‘goodies’ to corporations in return for folding them into its domestic surveillance machinery.”
When the government raises its alert levels, InfraGard is in the loop. For instance, in a press release on February 7, 2003, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General announced that the national alert level was being raised from yellow to orange. They then listed “additional steps” that agencies were taking to “increase their protective measures.” One of those steps was to “provide alert information to InfraGard program.”
“They’re very much looped into our readiness capability,” says Amy Kudwa, spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security. “We provide speakers, as well as do joint presentations [with the FBI]. We also train alongside them, and they have participated in readiness exercises.”
On May 9, 2007, George Bush issued National Security Presidential Directive 51 entitled “National Continuity Policy.” In it, he instructed the Secretary of Homeland Security to coordinate with “private sector owners and operators of critical infrastructure, as appropriate, in order to provide for the delivery of essential services during an emergency.”
Asked if the InfraGard National Members Alliance was involved with these plans, Schneck said it was “not directly participating at this point.” Hershman, chairman of the group’s advisory board, however, said that it was.
InfraGard members, sometimes hundreds at a time, have been used in “national emergency preparation drills,” Schneck acknowledges.
“In case something happens, everybody is ready,” says Norm Arendt, the head of the Madison, Wisconsin, chapter of InfraGard, and the safety director for the consulting firm Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. “There’s been lots of discussions about what happens under an emergency.”
One business owner in the United States tells me that InfraGard members are being advised on how to prepare for a martial law situation—and what their role might be. He showed me his InfraGard card, with his name and e-mail address on the front, along with the InfraGard logo and its slogan, “Partnership for Protection.” On the back of the card were the emergency numbers that Schneck mentioned.
This business owner says he attended a small InfraGard meeting where agents of the FBI and Homeland Security discussed in astonishing detail what InfraGard members may be called upon to do.
“The meeting started off innocuously enough, with the speakers talking about corporate espionage,” he says. “From there, it just progressed. All of a sudden we were knee deep in what was expected of us when martial law is declared. We were expected to share all our resources, but in return we’d be given specific benefits.” These included, he says, the ability to travel in restricted areas and to get people out.But that’s not all.
“Then they said when—not if—martial law is declared, it was our responsibility to protect our portion of the infrastructure, and if we had to use deadly force to protect it, we couldn’t be prosecuted,” he says.
I was able to confirm that the meeting took place where he said it had, and that the FBI and Homeland Security did make presentations there. One InfraGard member who attended that meeting denies that the subject of lethal force came up. But the whistleblower is 100 percent certain of it. “I have nothing to gain by telling you this, and everything to lose,” he adds. “I’m so nervous about this, and I’m not someone who gets nervous.”
Though Schneck says that FBI and Homeland Security agents do make presentations to InfraGard, she denies that InfraGard members would have any civil patrol or law enforcement functions. “I have never heard of InfraGard members being told to use lethal force anywhere,” Schneck says.
The FBI adamantly denies it, also. “That’s ridiculous,” says Catherine Milhoan, an FBI spokesperson. “If you want to quote a businessperson saying that, knock yourself out. If that’s what you want to print, fine.”
But one other InfraGard member corroborated the whistleblower’s account, and another would not deny it.
Christine Moerke is a business continuity consultant for Alliant Energy in Madison, Wisconsin. She says she’s an InfraGard member, and she confirms that she has attended InfraGard meetings that went into the details about what kind of civil patrol function—including engaging in lethal force—that InfraGard members may be called upon to perform.
“There have been discussions like that, that I’ve heard of and participated in,” she says.
Curt Haugen is CEO of S’Curo Group, a company that does “strategic planning, business continuity planning and disaster recovery, physical and IT security, policy development, internal control, personnel selection, and travel safety,” according to its website. Haugen tells me he is a former FBI agent and that he has been an InfraGard member for many years. He is a huge booster. “It’s the only true organization where there is the public-private partnership,” he says. “It’s all who knows who. You know a face, you trust a face. That’s what makes it work.”
He says InfraGard “absolutely” does emergency preparedness exercises. When I ask about discussions the FBI and Homeland Security have had with InfraGard members about their use of lethal force, he says: “That much I cannot comment on. But as a private citizen, you have the right to use force if you feel threatened.”
“We were assured that if we were forced to kill someone to protect our infrastructure, there would be no repercussions,” the whistleblower says. “It gave me goose bumps. It chilled me to the bone.”
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine and the author of "You Have No Rights: Stories of America in an Age of Repression." This article, "The FBI Deputizes Business," is the cover story of the March issue
Source: http://tinyurl.com/yraxzj
Also see: http://www.infragard.net/
D2
Thursday, February 07, 2008
How Anarchy is Systematically Undermined
Anarchy is a prime target for being torpedoed. It's done so easily. The economic and political powers that be don't have to destroy Anarchism as a movement. They simply render it ineffectual by planting people who ridicule anything that doesn't sound like what they want things to sound like and they want it to sound like monotonous, droning, ever-repeating words and phrases that, having been repeated endless times, become boring, emptied of content, hypnotic. The petty and weak-willed among you, those who need an orthodoxy to guide their way, and those who have hitched their entire identity wagon to Anarchy take their cue from that.
There's a species of bird, I think it's the cuckoo actually, that will expel any chick from the nest that doesn't nod exactly as the family does. One errant nod of the head, and the chick or fledgling is pushed out of the nest before it can fly. Anarchists, sadly, have been brought to the lowly emotional and ideological state of the cuckoo - and you have done so willingly.
They are instructed to throw out the good and the bad in religion alike so that no one is left who cultivates humility or attempts to suppress their ego or attempts to practice unconditional love.
They so easily play on your ego. If someone doesn't behave properly, feel free to feel one up by calling them "annoying", or worse.
The momentary satisfaction of feeling superior to someone is more valuable to too many of you than the Anarchist movement and all the hope it holds out. And that is why you're ineffectual.
Nuance is more important to you than substance and that is why the Anarchist movement is fractured to the point of being crippled.
One Israeli Anarchist's recent behavior toward me is typical. Rather than celebrating the fact that there is another Anarchist in Israel, we are a very rare breed, and reaching out to me in solidarity; he wrote me a snide little post because I didn't immediately go into a harangue about the wall and all Anarchists must do that - it's the nod, you know, everyone *knows* that.
He's one of those Jewish Anarchists who need to prove himself to the Gentiles. My feeling is to say to him: lose the inferiority complex, Jew boy. They can feel your desperation and it's embarrassing to us who aren't doing figure eights to be accepted.
It's not my way to concern myself with individual expressions of what's wrong. I do the systems analysis of how the rich and powerful work and articulate what's wrong to others. That's my style, my particular talent and my potential contribution if you'll recognize it as such. I know that there are people that are much better at details than I, and I am confident that they will carry out their tasks, in accordance with their talents and aptitudes, and, in so doing, make their contributions to The Cause. Their work complements that of the people who see overall systems. The one does not contradict the other and most certainly does not impede or devalue the other. If you'll be wise enough to recognize the contributions that others who think and work differently than you can make to Anarchy, rather than insisting that they nod the nod right; you'll realize you've got worthwhile comrades and you will encourage their dedication. If not, the loss will be to the Anarchist movement in general and we'll all continue to suffer a while longer.
Too many of you do not yet understand that the differences in people are their relative strengths and you most certainly don't know how to make the best of that, how to utilize those differences, which are strengths as complements and supplements of one another. The Rothschilds do. Their whole empire is built on that knowledge. Someone by the name of Davidson sent a letter to Nathan Rothschild on June 24, 1814. In the letter he wrote, "As long as a house is like yours, and as long as you work together with your brothers, not a house in the world will be able to compete with you, to cause you harm or to take advantage of you, for together you can undertake and perform more than any house in the world." Saloman (Salmon) Rothschild wrote the following to his brother Nathan on Feb. 28, 1815, "We are like the mechanism of a watch: each part is essential." Would that Anarchists would understand this! But you don't. That is why their boot is on your neck and will remain there until such time as you learn to work with others in tandem without jealousy, contests of will or thinking of others as threats.
There is another extremely important matter that the Rothschilds have down pat that the Anarchists have not begun to understand. Reality is this *and* that, not this *or* that. If you think disjunctively, if you think that you must line up on one side of an issue or the other, if you can't think comprehensively – you are the easy prey of those who can. They see all sides and know how to work them to their best advantage. So must we if we are to defeat them. We must learn to think conjunctively as they do, in terms of this *and* that, to be able to handle paradoxes, to be able to reconcile apparent contradictions - not opportunistically as they do, but creatively, or we will continue to be their sorry slaves and unwitting agents of their plots and schemes, that is, to be our own worst enemies.
The universe favors and fosters integrated complexes and systems, whether they are good or bad. Those who can form a complex, integrated, cooperating system will always have the advantage over those who, for the sake of petty ego and the cheap thrill of squabbles, insist upon being atoms.
Rather than understanding that if Anarchy is to work there *must* be endless nuance (not annoyance, nuance), you take any difference you see as a sign that it is issuing from "a foreign body" and expel it like so much pus.
Anarchy is a great and noble undertaking and vision.
Pettiness and greatness of character both reside within the sphere of human possibility, with the former being the easier of the two options, admittedly. Yet, both can be encouraged and brought to greater degrees of expression. *You* allow those who would manipulate you by encouraging your innate pettiness to do so. You can make the choice to listen to the few who urge you on to greatness. That is what I am attempting to do in writing this. Be smart enough to recognize something intended for your well being.
The petty are wholly unfit for Anarchy. The people pulling the money strings know this. That is why they plant people among you who make being sarcastic and jaded look sophisticated and cool. But they are not wholly to blame. Your willingness to go along with it is your culpability and cooperation with the powers that be and yours alone.
If you cannot, or will not, become great; you deserve to be oppressed and controlled and downtrodden and impoverished and humiliated and brainwashed until such time as you have had enough and are prepared to swallow the "bitter pill" of cultivating humility and unconditional love for another Anarchist.
First effect a revolution in your own hearts and psyches and at the very least be able to overcome the momentary pleasure of a cheap put-downs for the sake of solidarity. Only then will you begin to be fit to call yourselves Anarchists.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Anarchy is a prime target for being torpedoed. It's done so easily. The economic and political powers that be don't have to destroy Anarchism as a movement. They simply render it ineffectual by planting people who ridicule anything that doesn't sound like what they want things to sound like and they want it to sound like monotonous, droning, ever-repeating words and phrases that, having been repeated endless times, become boring, emptied of content, hypnotic. The petty and weak-willed among you, those who need an orthodoxy to guide their way, and those who have hitched their entire identity wagon to Anarchy take their cue from that.
There's a species of bird, I think it's the cuckoo actually, that will expel any chick from the nest that doesn't nod exactly as the family does. One errant nod of the head, and the chick or fledgling is pushed out of the nest before it can fly. Anarchists, sadly, have been brought to the lowly emotional and ideological state of the cuckoo - and you have done so willingly.
They are instructed to throw out the good and the bad in religion alike so that no one is left who cultivates humility or attempts to suppress their ego or attempts to practice unconditional love.
They so easily play on your ego. If someone doesn't behave properly, feel free to feel one up by calling them "annoying", or worse.
The momentary satisfaction of feeling superior to someone is more valuable to too many of you than the Anarchist movement and all the hope it holds out. And that is why you're ineffectual.
Nuance is more important to you than substance and that is why the Anarchist movement is fractured to the point of being crippled.
One Israeli Anarchist's recent behavior toward me is typical. Rather than celebrating the fact that there is another Anarchist in Israel, we are a very rare breed, and reaching out to me in solidarity; he wrote me a snide little post because I didn't immediately go into a harangue about the wall and all Anarchists must do that - it's the nod, you know, everyone *knows* that.
He's one of those Jewish Anarchists who need to prove himself to the Gentiles. My feeling is to say to him: lose the inferiority complex, Jew boy. They can feel your desperation and it's embarrassing to us who aren't doing figure eights to be accepted.
It's not my way to concern myself with individual expressions of what's wrong. I do the systems analysis of how the rich and powerful work and articulate what's wrong to others. That's my style, my particular talent and my potential contribution if you'll recognize it as such. I know that there are people that are much better at details than I, and I am confident that they will carry out their tasks, in accordance with their talents and aptitudes, and, in so doing, make their contributions to The Cause. Their work complements that of the people who see overall systems. The one does not contradict the other and most certainly does not impede or devalue the other. If you'll be wise enough to recognize the contributions that others who think and work differently than you can make to Anarchy, rather than insisting that they nod the nod right; you'll realize you've got worthwhile comrades and you will encourage their dedication. If not, the loss will be to the Anarchist movement in general and we'll all continue to suffer a while longer.
Too many of you do not yet understand that the differences in people are their relative strengths and you most certainly don't know how to make the best of that, how to utilize those differences, which are strengths as complements and supplements of one another. The Rothschilds do. Their whole empire is built on that knowledge. Someone by the name of Davidson sent a letter to Nathan Rothschild on June 24, 1814. In the letter he wrote, "As long as a house is like yours, and as long as you work together with your brothers, not a house in the world will be able to compete with you, to cause you harm or to take advantage of you, for together you can undertake and perform more than any house in the world." Saloman (Salmon) Rothschild wrote the following to his brother Nathan on Feb. 28, 1815, "We are like the mechanism of a watch: each part is essential." Would that Anarchists would understand this! But you don't. That is why their boot is on your neck and will remain there until such time as you learn to work with others in tandem without jealousy, contests of will or thinking of others as threats.
There is another extremely important matter that the Rothschilds have down pat that the Anarchists have not begun to understand. Reality is this *and* that, not this *or* that. If you think disjunctively, if you think that you must line up on one side of an issue or the other, if you can't think comprehensively – you are the easy prey of those who can. They see all sides and know how to work them to their best advantage. So must we if we are to defeat them. We must learn to think conjunctively as they do, in terms of this *and* that, to be able to handle paradoxes, to be able to reconcile apparent contradictions - not opportunistically as they do, but creatively, or we will continue to be their sorry slaves and unwitting agents of their plots and schemes, that is, to be our own worst enemies.
The universe favors and fosters integrated complexes and systems, whether they are good or bad. Those who can form a complex, integrated, cooperating system will always have the advantage over those who, for the sake of petty ego and the cheap thrill of squabbles, insist upon being atoms.
Rather than understanding that if Anarchy is to work there *must* be endless nuance (not annoyance, nuance), you take any difference you see as a sign that it is issuing from "a foreign body" and expel it like so much pus.
Anarchy is a great and noble undertaking and vision.
Pettiness and greatness of character both reside within the sphere of human possibility, with the former being the easier of the two options, admittedly. Yet, both can be encouraged and brought to greater degrees of expression. *You* allow those who would manipulate you by encouraging your innate pettiness to do so. You can make the choice to listen to the few who urge you on to greatness. That is what I am attempting to do in writing this. Be smart enough to recognize something intended for your well being.
The petty are wholly unfit for Anarchy. The people pulling the money strings know this. That is why they plant people among you who make being sarcastic and jaded look sophisticated and cool. But they are not wholly to blame. Your willingness to go along with it is your culpability and cooperation with the powers that be and yours alone.
If you cannot, or will not, become great; you deserve to be oppressed and controlled and downtrodden and impoverished and humiliated and brainwashed until such time as you have had enough and are prepared to swallow the "bitter pill" of cultivating humility and unconditional love for another Anarchist.
First effect a revolution in your own hearts and psyches and at the very least be able to overcome the momentary pleasure of a cheap put-downs for the sake of solidarity. Only then will you begin to be fit to call yourselves Anarchists.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Monday, February 04, 2008
Hitler Used Rothschild's Typewriter to Write Mein Kampf
It's HIGH TIME we Jews roused ourselves out of the complacency and lethargy of our mythology, overcame the feeling of superiority that hating the "Goyim" affords and generally tore ourselves away from the Manishewitz whine and cheese party (why does shit always happen to *me*) and began to understand who our real, home-grown, enemies are.
Until you have the courage to face this truth, never say "Never Again!"
Caveat: I do not refer to these people as "Illuminati". That is part and parcel of the mythology they disseminate to make people feel inferior to them.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Until you have the courage to face this truth, never say "Never Again!"
Caveat: I do not refer to these people as "Illuminati". That is part and parcel of the mythology they disseminate to make people feel inferior to them.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)