Friday, October 31, 2008


About a year ago, Alex Jones showed a document that criminalizes certain activities that the government of the US claims "obstructs" the flow of society and/or business. One of those activities is animal rights endorsement. At the time it seemed so extreme and far out to me that I made a mental note of it, but filed it away in my memory as something not demanding immediate concern.Now I'm concerned.

I'm nobody's vegan, or even vegetarian, but I do recognize the fact that animals have rights to life.

I cannot accept animal testing on products.

I went to get my Son some more of his favorite body wash/shampoo for men. It's an Israeli brand called "Hawaii".I looked at the label on the back of the squeeze bottle for some reason, even though I was quite sure that the bunny that shows that it's not tested on animals is on the label. It wasn't.I was almost positive that if we embraced the product as a "regular" that it must not be tested on animals.I didn't buy the body wash/shampoo. I wanted to double check at home. Sure enough, when I got home I saw that the squeeze bottle we have does have a bunny on it and says that the product is not tested on animals.I checked other products in the store. Again, products that I am quite sure had the bunny and said they were not tested on animals now do not have the bunny on them.I am not talking about products we import through Unilever, which never had the bunny on them. I'm talking about the products I once felt confident were cruelty-free.

This may be a trend in regression to animal experimentation.Please be very careful about the products you buy, even those you thought are cruelty-free may not be now.If you care, please check every product that you buy.Boycott any products that experiment on animals. Those experiments are horrific. Even products for babies can be, and some are, formulated without testing on animals.

There is simply no excuse for it and nothing justifies a company reverting back to testing on animals when they know damn well that the products they formulated were just fine without testing them on animals. I am going to send this notification to a number of companies and let them know that I am broadcasting this all over the net.Please join with me in both protesting this wanton cruelty and letting the companies know we will boycott any product that was developed by torturing a helpless animal.

This is not some kooky cause. This is a very real necessity. Animals are treated horrendously by people interested in nothing but profits and that includes many, many industries.

This is a list of products to boycott. They remain recalcitrant in the face of ongoing boycott. More people are needed to stop buying their products to break their backs.

None of these products are essential and none do not have cruelty-free alternative products on the market.

Avon Cosmetics
Johnson & Johnson
The Body Shop/L’Oreal+
Lever Fabergé
Christion Dior
Miners Cosmetics
Colgate Palmolive
PZ Cussons
Reckitt Benckiser
Estée Lauder
SC Johnson
Virgin Vie
Yves Rocher
Yves Saint Laurent
Helena Rubenstein
Unilever markets widely in Israel. They are a very aggressive company. Though their site claims that they are committed to phasing out experiments on animals, they appear on the lists of offending companies.

None of the products that they market in Israel are indicated that they do not do testing on animals - not one.

I have written to them complaining about this.

The e-addies are:

feedback.israel at unilever dot com

sherut.israel at unilver dot com


Thursday, October 16, 2008

Want more proof that Torah calls for Anarchism?

Four times in the Book of Judges we are told that "there was no king in Israel in those days" (Judges 17:6; 18:1; 19:1; 21:25).

Judges 17:6 is usually rendered in English thus: "In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes."

But that is not what the Hebrew says. It says:

בַּיָּמִים הָהֵם אֵין מֶלֶךְ בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל: אִישׁ הַיָּשָׁר בְּעֵינָיו יַעֲשֶׂה

Which means: In those days there was no king in Israel. The people were honest and as one, doing what is right in His eyes.


Monday, October 06, 2008

VIDEO: Of Course There Are Angels

A discussion of Angels in their supernal and earthly aspects, including their relation to Anarchism and labor. The Hebrew word for angel, מלאך, pronounced malakh, is derived from the Hebrew root that means labor, skill, craft.

In Part 3 and 4 I discuss the true understanding of the story that most people read as "the binding of Isaac".

This is the link to the first segment on You Tube:

I am currently uploading it onto Google, where it will appear in one segment.


Sunday, October 05, 2008

PLEASE! Do NOT allow yourself to be incited to violence.

There are agents out there, some of whom are posing as people who are sympathetic to the libertarian movements, who are calling for violence.

Don't let them bait you.

This is the video by Lyndon LaRouche to which I respond:

This is my response:

PLEASE! Do NOT allow yourself to be incited to violence.

That's just what they want.

That's the excuse they're looking for to start the mass detentions and depopulation.

A commenter on this video suggested boycotting key companies as the response of choice. Way To Go!

Get rid of your TV too.


Thursday, October 02, 2008

Space & Time as Described by a Vastly More Encompassing System Than Classical Math

If you think you understand math, and if you think you don't understand math because you just don't geddit, this is a must see video for you.

On Google:

On You Tube:

Classical math is one very small subset of a vastly more comprehensive mathematics.

Herein, I introduce that math and demonstrate the time and space it describes.

There are errata in the video:

I should have said that one of the values of ב is 1001^-998.

Also, I said that another of the values of ב, the simplest value of which is 2, is 1001 x 2000 = 2,002,000. That is correct, but the careful viewer will notice that it is a product of ב x ב, not ב x א. It is a correct value of ב with the diacritical grammatical point, which doubles its value.

Finally, I gave values for the letter ח when I intended ז. The correct basic values for the letter ז are: 7, 1006, 2005, 3004, 4003, 5002, 6001 and 7000.

I stated the value 4 for the letter ד both at the beginning and the end of the list of basic values. It should be: 4, 1003, 2002, 3001, 4000.

For more background see: